250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10947017)
1. A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients.
Povoski SP
Ann Surg Oncol; 2000 Aug; 7(7):496-502. PubMed ID: 10947017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External jugular vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in cancer patients: A potentially useful alternative.
Povoski SP
World J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 2():7. PubMed ID: 15090065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guidewire assisted cephalic vein cutdown for insertion of totally implantable access ports.
Chang HM; Hsieh HF; Hsu SD; Liao GS; Lin CH; Hsieh CB; Yu JC
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 95(2):156-7. PubMed ID: 17262733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports.
Hsu CC; Kwan GN; Evans-Barns H; Rophael JA; van Driel ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD008942. PubMed ID: 27544827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound-based prediction of cephalic vein cutdown success prior to totally implantable venous access device placement.
Staszewicz W; Naiken SP; Mennet A; Meyer J; Righini M; Morel P; Toso C
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2019 Nov; 7(6):865-869.e1. PubMed ID: 31495770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalic vein cutdown for inserting indwelling subclavian vein catheters in gynecologic oncology patients.
Kamat A; Kramer P; Soisson AP
W V Med J; 2002; 98(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11941896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized trial comparing implantation of subcutaneous indwelling venous access devices by the cephalic vein cutdown (CVC) approach versus the percutaneous subclavian vein (PSV) approach.
Povoski SP; Young DC
Chir Ital; 2003; 55(1):149-50. PubMed ID: 12633056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Totally implantable venous access ports by cephalic vein cut-down for patients receiving chemotherapy].
Ayadi S; Ksantini R; Maghrebi H; Daghfous A; Ayadi M; Fteriche F; Bedioui H; Chebbi F; Amous A; Jouini M; Kacem M; Mezlini A; Ben Safta Z
Tunis Med; 2011; 89(8-9):699-702. PubMed ID: 21948685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.
Biffi R; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Pace U; Bonomo G; Monfardini L; Della Vigna P; Rotmensz N; Radice D; Zampino MG; Fazio N; de Braud F; Andreoni B; Goldhirsch A
Ann Oncol; 2009 May; 20(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 19179550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of a totally implantable access port through the external jugular vein when the cephalic vein approach is not feasible.
Lin YC; Chu CH; Ou KW; Chan DC; Hsieh CB; Chen TW; Hsu HM; Yu JC
Ann Vasc Surg; 2011 Feb; 25(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 20926248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein
Iorio O; Gazzanelli S; D'Ermo G; Pezzolla A; Gurrado A; Testini M; De Toma G; Cavallaro G
Am Surg; 2018 Jun; 84(6):841-843. PubMed ID: 29981612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Avoiding complications of long-term venous access.
Henriques HF; Karmy-Jones R; Knoll SM; Copes WS; Giordano JM
Am Surg; 1993 Sep; 59(9):555-8. PubMed ID: 8368659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G; Caramitti A; Aurello P; Lauro S; Bordin F; Della Casa U
Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct cephalic vein cannulation for safe subclavian access.
Perry EP; Nash JR; Klidjian AM
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1990 Aug; 35(4):218-20. PubMed ID: 2121966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
Di Carlo I; Barbagallo F; Toro A; Sofia M; Lombardo R; Cordio S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques.
Burnett AF; Lossef SV; Barth KH; Grendys EC; Johnson JC; Barter JF; Barnes WA
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
Chen PT; Sung CS; Wang CC; Chan KH; Chang WK; Hsu WH
J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device.
Orci LA; Meier RP; Morel P; Staszewicz W; Toso C
Br J Surg; 2014 Jan; 101(2):8-16. PubMed ID: 24276950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Totally implantable venous access devices implanted surgically: a retrospective study on early and late complications.
Di Carlo I; Cordio S; La Greca G; Privitera G; Russello D; Puleo S; Latteri F
Arch Surg; 2001 Sep; 136(9):1050-3. PubMed ID: 11529829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous insertion of long-term venous access catheters via the external iliac vein.
Mathur MN; Storey DW; White GH; Ramsey-Stewart G
Aust N Z J Surg; 1993 Nov; 63(11):858-63. PubMed ID: 8216063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
