BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10947261)

  • 1. Photon dose calculation of a three-dimensional treatment planning system compared to the Monte Carlo code BEAM.
    Francescon P; Cavedon C; Reccanello S; Cora S
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1579-87. PubMed ID: 10947261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo photon beam modeling and commissioning for radiotherapy dose calculation algorithm.
    Toutaoui A; Ait chikh S; Khelassi-Toutaoui N; Hattali B
    Phys Med; 2014 Nov; 30(7):833-7. PubMed ID: 24947967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
    Chow JC; Jiang R; Leung MK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3424. PubMed ID: 21330989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set.
    Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Libby B; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 12722809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
    Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photon beam relative dose validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code in lung-equivalent media.
    Chetty IJ; Charland PM; Tyagi N; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Bielajew AF
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):563-73. PubMed ID: 12722808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MCTP system model based on linear programming optimization of apertures obtained from sequencing patient image data maps.
    Ureba A; Salguero FJ; Barbeiro AR; Jimenez-Ortega E; Baeza JA; Miras H; Linares R; Perucha M; Leal A
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081719. PubMed ID: 25086529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new concept of pencil beam dose calculation for 40-200 keV photons using analytical dose kernels.
    Bartzsch S; Oelfke U
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111714. PubMed ID: 24320422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
    Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms with Monte Carlo methods for photon arcs.
    Chow JC; Wong E; Chen JZ; Van Dyk J
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2686-94. PubMed ID: 14596305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
    Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
    Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system.
    Ma CM; Mok E; Kapur A; Pawlicki T; Findley D; Brain S; Forster K; Boyer AL
    Med Phys; 1999 Oct; 26(10):2133-43. PubMed ID: 10535630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commissioning a fast Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for lung cancer treatment planning.
    Craig J; Oliver M; Gladwish A; Mulligan M; Chen J; Wong E
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 9(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 18714276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and commissioning of a Monte Carlo photon beam model for the forthcoming clinical trials in microbeam radiation therapy.
    Martínez-Rovira I; Sempau J; Prezado Y
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):119-31. PubMed ID: 22225281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.