These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10947268)

  • 1. Comparison of dosimetry calibration factors at the NRCC and the NIST. National Research Council of Canada. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
    Shortt K; Shobe J; Domen S
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1644-54. PubMed ID: 10947268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The US radiation dosimetry standards for 60Co therapy level beams, and the transfer to the AAPM accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Minniti R; Chen-Mayer H; Seltzer SM; Huq MS; Bryson L; Slowey T; Micka JA; DeWerd LA; Wells N; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS;
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1074-7. PubMed ID: 16696484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
    Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulation evaluation of NIST air-kerma rate calibration standard for electronic brachytherapy.
    Hiatt JR; Rivard MJ; Hughes HG
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1119-29. PubMed ID: 26936699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of Australian and Canadian calibration coefficients for air kerma and absorbed dose to water for 60Co gamma radiation.
    Shortt KR; Huntley RB; Kotler LH; Boas JF; Webb DV
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Jun; 29(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16845927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of the reference air kerma rate for 192Ir brachytherapy sources and the related uncertainty.
    van Dijk E; Kolkman-Deurloo IK; Damen PM
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2826-33. PubMed ID: 15543790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of dose-rate constant for 103Pd seeds with air kerma strength calibration based upon a primary national standard.
    Nath R; Yue N; Shahnazi K; Bongiorni PJ
    Med Phys; 2000 Apr; 27(4):655-8. PubMed ID: 10798685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between absorbed dose to water standards established by water calorimetry at the LNE-LNHB and by application of international air-kerma based protocols for kilovoltage medium energy x-rays.
    Perichon N; Rapp B; Denoziere M; Daures J; Ostrowsky A; Bordy JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 May; 58(9):2787-806. PubMed ID: 23563051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Air kerma based dosimetry calibration for the Leksell Gamma Knife.
    Meltsner SG; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):339-50. PubMed ID: 19291973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams.
    McEwen MR
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2179-93. PubMed ID: 20527552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two methods of therapy level calibration at 60Co gamma beams.
    Bjerke H; Järvinen H; Grimbergen TW; Grindborg JE; Chauvenet B; Czap L; Ennow K; Moretti C; Rocha P
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Oct; 43(10):2729-40. PubMed ID: 9814513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shift in absorbed dose for megavoltage photons when changing to TRS-398 in Australia.
    Butler DJ; Palmans H; Webb DV; ;
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 16250469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.