These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10947325)
1. A potential method for the specification of microbial barrier properties. Scholla MH; Hackett ET; Rudys S; Michels C; Bletsos J Med Device Technol; 2000 Apr; 11(3):12-6. PubMed ID: 10947325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new microbial barrier test for porous medical packaging materials. Fielding P Med Device Technol; 2001 Apr; 12(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 11547680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A packaging update. Recycling, testing, and pricing. Baker MC Med Device Technol; 1995 May; 6(4):31-3. PubMed ID: 10155385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Definition of a correlation between microbiological and physical particulate barrier performances for porous medical packaging materials. Sinclair CS; Tallentire A PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2002; 56(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11865778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meeting the needs of an ever-demanding market. Rigby R Med Device Technol; 2002 Apr; 13(3):10-4. PubMed ID: 12030098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Tests of the microbiologic barrier in sterile packaging]. Jakimiak B; Röhm-Rodowald E Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2002; 53(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 12235676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to validate a packaging process. Turner M Med Device Technol; 2004 Mar; 15(2):20-3. PubMed ID: 15154335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical packaging: more for less? Andrews J; Hunt N Med Device Technol; 1999 Apr; 10(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 10387624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An international standard for terminally sterilized medical device packaging. Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1997; 8(6):10-2. PubMed ID: 10169623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining permeability and diffusion rates in polymer films and packaging materials. Levoguer CL; Williams DR Med Device Technol; 1998 May; 9(4):14-8. PubMed ID: 10180742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying packaging errors. Hall RE Med Device Technol; 2008; 19(2):16-8, 20-1. PubMed ID: 18605286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Myths and realities in medical packaging. Pilchik R Med Device Technol; 2003 Mar; 14(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 12698692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guidance on the new packaging standard. Flexible Packaging Association Med Device Technol; 2006; 17(9):34-5. PubMed ID: 17240685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. European and US quality system requirements for packaging. Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1997 May; 8(4):12-4, 16-7. PubMed ID: 10167684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Process reliability through qualification and validation. Ehrat M; Steinbauer J; Wegmann H Med Device Technol; 2008; 19(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 18605296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Materials for preformed rigid-tray packages. Pilchik R Med Device Technol; 1999 Apr; 10(3):20-4. PubMed ID: 10387623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Packaging regulation update. Getting to grips with the unavoidable. Fielding P Med Device Technol; 1999 Apr; 10(3):34-5. PubMed ID: 10387625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [A new method of testing the effectiveness of sterile packaging in general practice]. Dunkelberg H; Wedekind S Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002 Nov; 47(11):290-3. PubMed ID: 12494550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]