284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10949276)
1. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
Miller HI
Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
Hoffman DE
Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
Vasil IK
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. EPA issues, USDA amends respective biotech rules.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jun; 15(6):503. PubMed ID: 9181563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.
McHughen A; Smyth S
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
Powell K
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):467-8. PubMed ID: 12721555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The real curse of Frankenfood.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Feb; 17(2):113. PubMed ID: 10052332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The challenge of biotechnology.
Gore A; Owens S
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1985; 3(2):336-57. PubMed ID: 11652468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Playing catch-up.
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):637. PubMed ID: 15175666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
Mandal GN
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Agriculture. Biotech crops good for farmers and environment, Academy finds.
Stokstad E
Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5976):295. PubMed ID: 20395485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biotechnology. EPA proposal would exempt some GMOs from registry.
Reardon S
Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):652. PubMed ID: 21551040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Controversy over genetically modified organisms: the governing laws and regulations.
Keatley KL
Qual Assur; 2000; 8(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11710306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Congressional hearing on the adequacy of current statutes and scientific knowledge for the regulation of biotechnology.
Milewski E
Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1985 Mar; 8(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 3858924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
