284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10949276)
21. US, EU prepare for further biotech food dispute.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):897. PubMed ID: 11581641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Plant-associated agricultural applications of genetically engineered microorganisms: projections and constraints.
Vidaver AK
Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1985 Sep; 8(3):97-102. PubMed ID: 3864203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Toxicology. Panel urges further study of biotech corn.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1867. PubMed ID: 11187032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Proposed rules issued for bioengineered foods.
Formanek R
FDA Consum; 2001; 35(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 11444252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. GM advisory panel is slanted, say critics.
Wadman M
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6731):7. PubMed ID: 10331376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Biotech panel set up in US may help allay public fears.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6736):508. PubMed ID: 10376584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Intellectual property in higher life forms: the patent system and controversial technologies.
Merges RP
MD Law Rev; 1988; 47(4):1051-75. PubMed ID: 16514761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Clear-cut biotechnology regulations are a must.
Jefferson EG
Med Mark Media; 1985 Jul; 20(7):28-9, 32-3. PubMed ID: 10272849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Owning the secret of life: biotechnology and property rights revisited.
Yelpaala K
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):111-219. PubMed ID: 15709267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Don't rely on Uncle Sam.
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):807. PubMed ID: 15829921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. EPA biotech rule reviewed yet again.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 May; 17(5):415. PubMed ID: 10331783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The brave new world of animal biotechnology. Project report.
Donnelley S; McCarthy CR; Singleton R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1 Suppl):S1-31. PubMed ID: 11654088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Regulation of genetic modification of organisms: science or emotion?
Malinowski MJ
J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 11657280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Biotechnology. Transgenic crops report fuels debate.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Apr; 288(5464):245-7. PubMed ID: 10777400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation.
Craddock N
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. EU biotech crop regulations and environmental risk: a case of the emperor's new clothes?
Morris SH
Trends Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 17113665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Agbiotech issues climb US political agenda.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1179-80. PubMed ID: 12454658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Agbiotech climbs Africa's agenda.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):589. PubMed ID: 12776132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
Smyth S; McHughen A
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Putting Cartagena into practice.
Watanabe KN; Taeb M; Okusu H
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Oct; 22(10):1207-8. PubMed ID: 15470448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
