124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10949407)
1. Low dose responses.
Wilson R
Risk Anal; 2000 Jun; 20(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 10949407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Caution in drawing conclusions from PBPK models based on sparse human data.
Steenland K; Bartell S
Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):7-8; author reply 9-10. PubMed ID: 17362395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biological effects of low-level exposures: a perspective from U.S. EPA scientists.
Davis JM; Farland WH
Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Feb; 106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):379-81. PubMed ID: 9539033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing human health response in life cycle assessment using ED10s and DALYs: part 1--Cancer effects.
Crettaz P; Pennington D; Rhomberg L; Brand K; Jolliet O
Risk Anal; 2002 Oct; 22(5):931-46. PubMed ID: 12442990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linear no threshold (LNT)--the new homeopathy.
Calabrese EJ; Cook RR; Hanekamp JC
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2723. PubMed ID: 23165999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Approaches for applications of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in risk assessment.
Thompson CM; Sonawane B; Barton HA; DeWoskin RS; Lipscomb JC; Schlosser P; Chiu WA; Krishnan K
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2008 Aug; 11(7):519-47. PubMed ID: 18584453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk assessment, a community perspective.
Feldman J
Environ Health Perspect; 1995 Sep; 103 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):153-8. PubMed ID: 8549465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk assessment at the EPA: an agency self-exam.
Schmidt CW
Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Jun; 112(8):A482-5. PubMed ID: 15175195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Toxicology. Panel backs EPA dioxin assessment.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Nov; 290(5494):1071. PubMed ID: 11184998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk from low-dose exposures.
Zendzian RP
Science; 1994 Nov; 266(5188):1142-3. PubMed ID: 7973686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk from low-dose exposures.
Portier CJ; Lucier GW; Edler L
Science; 1994 Nov; 266(5188):1141-2. PubMed ID: 7973685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental report cards.
Schnoor JL
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Aug; 37(15):271A. PubMed ID: 12966950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reference dose (RfD): description and use in health risk assessments.
Barnes DG; Dourson M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1988 Dec; 8(4):471-86. PubMed ID: 3222488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing human health response in life cycle assessment using ED10s and DALYs: part 2--Noncancer effects.
Pennington D; Crettaz P; Tauxe A; Rhomberg L; Brand K; Jolliet O
Risk Anal; 2002 Oct; 22(5):947-63. PubMed ID: 12442991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Framework for metals risk assessment.
Fairbrother A; Wenstel R; Sappington K; Wood W
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Oct; 68(2):145-227. PubMed ID: 17889701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Children's vulnerability to cancer.
Cooney CM
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Jun; 37(11):204A. PubMed ID: 12831002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting children from environmental risks throughout each stage of their childhood.
Firestone M
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2010 May; 20(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 20407448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. US panel split on endocrine disruptors..
Macilwain C
Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6705):828. PubMed ID: 9804404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency procedures and policies to estimate risk of injury to the male reproductive system.
Francis EZ
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 302():3-16; discussion 17-20. PubMed ID: 2755956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nanomaterials meet increased scrutiny.
Christen K
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(3):671-2. PubMed ID: 17328164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
