124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10949407)
21. Trichloroethylene health risks--state of the science.
Scott CS; Cogliano VJ
Environ Health Perspect; 2000 May; 108 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):159-60. PubMed ID: 10928830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A toxicologist's view of cancer risk assessment.
Rozman KK; Kerecsen L; Viluksela MK; Osterle D; Deml E; Viluksela M; Stahl BU; Greim H; Doull J
Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):29-52. PubMed ID: 8744588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The NAS perchlorate review: is the RfD acceptable?
Strawson J; Dourson ML; Zhao QJ
Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Nov; 113(11):A729-30; author reply A730-2. PubMed ID: 16276625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The NAS perchlorate review: adverse effects?
Johnston RB; Corley R; Cowan L; Utiger RD
Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Nov; 113(11):A728-9; author reply A730-2. PubMed ID: 16276624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Improving the use of epidemiologic data in health risk assessment.
Erdreich LS; Burnett C
Toxicol Ind Health; 1985 Dec; 1(4):65-81. PubMed ID: 3843512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A molecular approach to cancer risk.
Stone R
Science; 1995 Apr; 268(5209):356-7. PubMed ID: 7716533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Reference dose (RfD): the possible impact of hormesis.
Barnes DG
J Appl Toxicol; 2000; 20(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 10715610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Application of epidemiology to the study of environmental carcinogens.
Neuberger JS; Chin TD
Rev Environ Health; 1984; 4(2):147-59. PubMed ID: 6397791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The beat goes on: researchers consider aging baby boomers' health.
Cooney CM
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Aug; 37(15):272A-273A. PubMed ID: 12966951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Scientific issues in the U.S. EPA Framework for Metals Risk Assessment.
Bradham K; Wentsel R
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2010; 73(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 20077282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The NAS perchlorate review: second-guessing the experts.
Gibbs JP; Engel A; Lamm SH
Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Nov; 113(11):A727-8; author reply A730-2. PubMed ID: 16263491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Ecological risk assessment in the United States environmental protection agency: a historical overview.
Suter GW
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jul; 4(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 18321143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Advances in health risk assessment for systemic toxicants and chemical mixtures. Introductory remarks.
Alm AL
Toxicol Ind Health; 1985 Dec; 1(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 3843495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The dose-response model for dioxin.
Byrd DM; Allen DO; Beamer RL; Besch HR; Bylund DB; Doull J; Fleming WW; Fries A; Guengerich FP; Hornbrook R; Lasagna L; Lum BK; Michaelis EK; Morgan ET; Poland A; Rozman KK; Smith JB; Swanson HI; Waddell W; Wilson JD
Risk Anal; 1998 Feb; 18(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 9556441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Environmental pathways of exposure to 129 priority pollutants.
Slimak M; Delos C
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol; 1983-1984; 21(1-2):39-63. PubMed ID: 6323730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of threshold and mode of action in risk assessment.
Crump KS
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 41(8):637-50. PubMed ID: 21718086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Basis for a proposed reference dose (RfD) for dioxin of 1-10 pg/kg-day: a weight of evidence evaluation of the human and animal studies.
Greene JF; Hays S; Paustenbach D
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(2):115-59. PubMed ID: 12554432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative risk assessment: report of the Subcommittee on Environmental Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Advisory Board.
Samuels SW; Adamson RH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1985 Apr; 74(4):945-51. PubMed ID: 3857389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Incorporating biologically based models into assessments of risk from chemical contaminants.
Bull RJ; Conolly RB; De Marini DM; MacPhail RC; Ohanian EV; Swenberg JA
J Am Water Works Assoc; 1993 Mar; 85(3):49-52. PubMed ID: 11538064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cancer risk assessment: historical perspectives, current issues, and future directions.
Velazquez SF; Schoeny R; Rice GE; Cogliano VJ
Drug Chem Toxicol; 1996 Aug; 19(3):161-85. PubMed ID: 8933022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
