BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10950218)

  • 1. Protecting consumers by safeguarding animal health.
    Sundlof SF
    Am Fam Physician; 2000 Aug; 62(3):659-60. PubMed ID: 10950218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FDA proposes ruminant-to-ruminant feeding ban.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1997 Mar; 210(5):595. PubMed ID: 9054982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FDA proposes additional mad cow safeguards.
    FDA Consum; 2005; 39(6):6. PubMed ID: 16671158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FDA continues work to help prevent mad cow disease.
    Bren L
    FDA Consum; 2002; 36(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 12085810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FDA finds more evidence of BSE compliance problems.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2001 Aug; 219(4):427. PubMed ID: 11518162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FDA investigators respond to mad cow emergency.
    Bren L
    FDA Consum; 2004; 38(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 15218845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agencies work to corral mad cow disease.
    Bren L
    FDA Consum; 2004; 38(3):28-35. PubMed ID: 15218844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FDA announces expanded safeguards against mad cow disease.
    J Environ Health; 2004 May; 66(9):29. PubMed ID: 15137347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of environmental pharmacology and toxicology: food sources of incidental drug exposure. Introductory remarks.
    Golberg L
    Fed Proc; 1975 Feb; 34(2):195-6. PubMed ID: 1116614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contaminated feed heightens "mad cow" fears in the United States.
    SoRelle R
    Circulation; 2001 Feb; 103(8):E9015-6. PubMed ID: 11256372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Harvard study finds BSE poses little threat to U.S. consumers, agriculture.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2002 Feb; 220(3):279-80. PubMed ID: 11829250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The importance of animals.
    Sundlof SF
    FDA Consum; 2004; 38(1):40. PubMed ID: 15032204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of the Animal Drug Availability Act on veterinary practitioners and the animal health industry.
    Troutman LM; Vaughn SD; Schmerfeld G; Beaulieu AJ
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1997 Jun; 210(11):1597-600. PubMed ID: 9170084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy: the importance of precautionary measures to protect the food supply.
    DeWaal CS; Vegosen L
    Food Drug Law J; 2003; 58(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 15027448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What are they feeding that cow?
    Consum Rep; 2004 Mar; 69(3):49. PubMed ID: 15005093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plan put to test.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1997 Aug; 211(3):273. PubMed ID: 9262659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safeguards strengthened against mad cow disease.
    FDA Consum; 2004; 38(5):7. PubMed ID: 15595139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beef blockade greets first mad cow in United States.
    Dalton R; Check E
    Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6969):5. PubMed ID: 14702055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Swann report.
    Freeman A
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1970 Jul; 157(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 5421410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combating mad cow disease in the United States.
    Henderson DA
    Public Health Rep; 1997; 112(5):357-8. PubMed ID: 9323380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.