These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10953536)
1. Do restorations made of amalgam outlast those made of resin-based composite? Leinfelder KF J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Aug; 131(8):1186-7. PubMed ID: 10953536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Remaining challenges with Class II resin-based composite restorations. Christensen GJ J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Nov; 138(11):1487-9. PubMed ID: 17974646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of wear and clinical performance between amalgam, composite and open sandwich restorations: 2-year results. Sachdeo A; Gray GB; Sulieman MA; Jagger DC Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 15058177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Composite-veneered amalgam restorations. Gordon M; Laufer BZ; Metzger Z J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):759-62. PubMed ID: 3866062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?]. De Moor R; Delmé K Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds? Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students. Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations. Full CA; Hollander WR ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The combined composite resin and amalgam restoration for posterior teeth: a clinical report. Roda RS; Zwicker PF Quintessence Int; 1992 Jan; 23(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 1631274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-quality evidence suggests that amalgam has increased longevity compared with resin-based composite in posterior restorations. Wong YJ J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Nov; 147(11):905-906. PubMed ID: 27793299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Marginal microinfiltration in Class II amalgam and composite resin restorations, with or without pins, submitted to thermal cycles]. Coradazzi JL; Mondelli J; Valera RC Ars Curandi Odontol; 1979 Feb; 5(11):9-14. PubMed ID: 397813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis. Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]