These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10953905)

  • 1. Ratings of perceived exertion in braille: validity and reliability in production mode.
    Buckley JP; Eston RG; Sim J
    Br J Sports Med; 2000 Aug; 34(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 10953905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity of a perceptually-regulated step test protocol for assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy adults.
    Bennett H; Davison K; Parfitt G; Eston R
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2016 Dec; 116(11-12):2337-2344. PubMed ID: 27709296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of ratings of perceived exertion during progressive treadmill exercise.
    Lamb KL; Eston RG; Corns D
    Br J Sports Med; 1999 Oct; 33(5):336-9. PubMed ID: 10522637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validity of ratings of perceived exertion for cross-modal regulation of swimming intensity.
    Green JM; Michael T; Solomon AH
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1999 Sep; 39(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10573662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion.
    Dunbar CC; Robertson RJ; Baun R; Blandin MF; Metz K; Burdett R; Goss FL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 Jan; 24(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 1549002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative heart rate, heart rate reserve, and VO2 during submaximal exercise in the elderly.
    Panton LB; Graves JE; Pollock ML; Garzarella L; Carroll JF; Leggett SH; Lowenthal DT; Guillen GJ
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 1996 Jul; 51(4):M165-71. PubMed ID: 8680999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulating exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during arm and leg ergometry.
    Kang J; Chaloupka EC; Mastrangelo MA; Donnelly MS; Martz WP; Robertson RJ
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1998 Aug; 78(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9721003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of perceived exertion during graded exercise testing in apparently healthy adults.
    Whaley MH; Woodall T; Kaminsky LA; Emmett JD
    J Cardiopulm Rehabil; 1997; 17(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 9041069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A BRIEF NOTE ON THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE RATING OF PERCEIVED EXERTION SCALE IN MONITORING EXERCISE INTENSITY AMONG CHINESE OLDER ADULTS IN HONG KONG.
    Chung PK; Zhao Y; Liu JD; Quach B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2015 Dec; 121(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 26595201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.
    Cleland BT; Ingraham BA; Pitluck MC; Woo D; Ng AV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jun; 97(6):974-82. PubMed ID: 26836954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Naturally occurring muscle pain during exercise: assessment and experimental evidence.
    Cook DB; O'Connor PJ; Eubanks SA; Smith JC; Lee M
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1997 Aug; 29(8):999-1012. PubMed ID: 9268956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of rating of perceived exertion during graded exercise testing in apparently healthy adults and cardiac patients.
    Whaley MH; Brubaker PH; Kaminsky LA; Miller CR
    J Cardiopulm Rehabil; 1997; 17(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 9271770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and comparison of RPE during variable and constant exercise protocols performed by older women.
    Wenos DL; Wallace JP; Surburg PR; Morris HH
    Int J Sports Med; 1996 Apr; 17(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 8739573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of ratings of perceived exertion for predicting maximal work rate and prescribing exercise intensity in patients taking atenolol.
    Eston RG; Thompson M
    Br J Sports Med; 1997 Jun; 31(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 9192123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heart rate during aerobics classes in women with different previous experience of aerobics.
    Laukkanen RM; Kalaja MK; Kalaja SP; Holmala EB; Paavolainen LM; Tummavuori M; Virtanen P; Rusko HK
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2001; 84(1-2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11394255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in ratings of perceived exertion and psychological affect in the early stages of exercise.
    Parfitt G; Eston R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Feb; 80(1):259-66. PubMed ID: 7624202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intermodal comparison of energy expenditure at exercise intensities corresponding to the perceptual preference range.
    Moyna NM; Robertson RJ; Meckes CL; Peoples JA; Millich NB; Thompson PD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Aug; 33(8):1404-10. PubMed ID: 11474346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new method for prescribing exercise: three-point ratings of perceived exertion.
    Dunbar CC; Kalinski MI; Robertson RJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 8668467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of ratings of perceived effort regulation of exercise intensity.
    Eston RG; Williams JG
    Br J Sports Med; 1988 Dec; 22(4):153-5. PubMed ID: 3228684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychological affect at different ratings of perceived exertion in high- and low-active women: a study using a production protocol.
    Parfitt G; Eston R; Connolly D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):1035-42. PubMed ID: 8774048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.