121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10954438)
1. Sample size tables for receiver operating characteristic studies.
Obuchowski NA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):603-8. PubMed ID: 10954438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging systems evaluation: effect of subtle cases on the design and analysis of receiver operating characteristic studies.
Rockette HE; King JL; Medina JL; Eisen HB; Brown ML; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 7645495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.
Obuchowski NA
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevalence effect in a laboratory environment.
Gur D; Rockette HE; Armfield DR; Blachar A; Bogan JK; Brancatelli G; Britton CA; Brown ML; Davis PL; Ferris JV; Fuhrman CR; Golla SK; Katyal S; Lacomis JM; McCook BM; Thaete FL; Warfel TE
Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12832568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The optimal ratio of cases to controls for estimating the classification accuracy of a biomarker.
Janes H; Pepe M
Biostatistics; 2006 Jul; 7(3):456-68. PubMed ID: 16428259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy.
Obuchowski NA
Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 9871953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Rossetti L; Iester M; Fogagnolo P; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2008 Aug; 115(8):1358-65, 1365.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18321579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical test to assess rank-order imaging studies.
Rockette HE; Li W; Brown ML; Britton CA; Towers JT; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jan; 8(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 11201453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Kim SH; Kim SH; Lee J; Kim MJ; Jeon YH; Park Y; Choi D; Lee WJ; Lim HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1675-81. PubMed ID: 19457834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What's the control in studies measuring the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on observer performance?
Obuchowski NA; Meziane M; Dachman AH; Lieber ML; Mazzone PJ
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 20457419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Added value of breathhold diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma lesions compared with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Xu PJ; Yan FH; Wang JH; Lin J; Ji Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19161186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sample size tables for computer-aided detection studies.
Obuchowski NA; Hillis SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):W821-8. PubMed ID: 22021528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing the number of reader interpretations in MRMC studies.
Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 19124107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis.
Uchida H; Brigatti L; Caprioli J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Nov; 37(12):2393-401. PubMed ID: 8933756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variability of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves in the diagnostic evaluation of liver fibrosis markers: impact of biopsy length and fragmentation.
Poynard T; Halfon P; Castera L; Charlotte F; Le Bail B; Munteanu M; Messous D; Ratziu V; Benhamou Y; Bourlière M; De Ledinghen V;
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Mar; 25(6):733-9. PubMed ID: 17311607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multireader receiver operating characteristic studies: a comparison of study designs.
Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):709-16. PubMed ID: 9419629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of pulsed arterial spin labeling for glioma grading.
Kim MJ; Kim HS; Kim JH; Cho KG; Kim SY
Acta Radiol; 2008 May; 49(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 18415790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement.
Michener LA; Walsworth MK; Doukas WC; Murphy KP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19887215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
