74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10954438)
21. Mobile device for thrombolysis decisions for telestroke.
Salazar AJ; Useche N; Granja MF; Morillo AJ; Bermúdez S; Sossa D; Ortiz CJ; Torres OJ; Ropero B
Colomb Med (Cali); 2018 Dec; 49(4):254-260. PubMed ID: 30700917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic value of the stand-alone synthetic image in digital breast tomosynthesis examinations.
Garayoa J; Chevalier M; Castillo M; Mahillo-Fernández I; Amallal El Ouahabi N; Estrada C; Tejerina A; Benitez O; Valverde J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):565-572. PubMed ID: 28812190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full-field digital mammography.
Abdullah AK; Kelly J; Thompson JD; Mercer CE; Aspin R; Hogg P
Br J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 90(1075):20160871. PubMed ID: 28508724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Critiquing operative fracture fixation: the development of an assessment tool.
Hawkes DH; Harrison WJ
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Dec; 27(8):1083-1088. PubMed ID: 28331965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Human Spermatozoa Quantitative Proteomic Signature Classifies Normo- and Asthenozoospermia.
Saraswat M; Joenväärä S; Jain T; Tomar AK; Sinha A; Singh S; Yadav S; Renkonen R
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 16(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 27895139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Noninferiority and Equivalence Evaluation of Clinical Performance among Computed Radiography, Film, and Digitized Film for Telemammography Services.
Salazar AJ; Romero JA; Bernal OA; Moreno AP; Velasco SC; Díaz XA
Int J Telemed Appl; 2016; 2016():3642960. PubMed ID: 27777584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Are UCH-L1 and GFAP promising biomarkers for children with mild traumatic brain injury?
Rhine T; Babcock L; Zhang N; Leach J; Wade SL
Brain Inj; 2016; 30(10):1231-8. PubMed ID: 27416022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts.
Terry GL; Noujeim M; Langlais RP; Moore WS; Prihoda TJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150159. PubMed ID: 26869221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radial quantitative ultrasound and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: intermethod agreement for bone status assessment in children.
Chong KH; Poh BK; Jamil NA; Kamaruddin NA; Deurenberg P
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():232876. PubMed ID: 25922831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of low-cost telemammography screening configurations: a comparison with film-screen readings in vulnerable areas.
Salazar AJ; Romero J; Bernal O; Moreno A; Velasco S; Díaz X
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Oct; 27(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 24802372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sample size estimation in epidemiologic studies.
Hajian-Tilaki K
Caspian J Intern Med; 2011; 2(4):289-98. PubMed ID: 24551434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Neither dynamic, static, nor volumetric variables can accurately predict fluid responsiveness early after abdominothoracic esophagectomy.
Ishihara H; Hashiba E; Okawa H; Saito J; Kasai T; Tsubo T
Perioper Med (Lond); 2013 Feb; 2(1):3. PubMed ID: 24472615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Statistical design for biospecimen cohort size in proteomics-based biomarker discovery and verification studies.
Skates SJ; Gillette MA; LaBaer J; Carr SA; Anderson L; Liebler DC; Ransohoff D; Rifai N; Kondratovich M; Težak Ž; Mansfield E; Oberg AL; Wright I; Barnes G; Gail M; Mesri M; Kinsinger CR; Rodriguez H; Boja ES
J Proteome Res; 2013 Dec; 12(12):5383-94. PubMed ID: 24063748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Vertical or horizontal orientation of foot radiographs does not affect image interpretation.
Ferran NA; Ball L; Maffulli N
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J; 2012 Oct; 2(4):278-81. PubMed ID: 23738310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.
Noroozian M; Hadjiiski L; Rahnama-Moghadam S; Klein KA; Jeffries DO; Pinsky RW; Chan HP; Carson PL; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21998048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. New developments in observer performance methodology in medical imaging.
Chakraborty DP
Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):401-18. PubMed ID: 21978444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using purified, deglycosylated histoplasmin for different clinical manifestations of histoplasmosis.
Guimarães AJ; Pizzini CV; De Abreu Almeida M; Peralta JM; Nosanchuk JD; Zancopé-Oliveira RM
Microbiol Res (Pavia); 2010; 1(1):. PubMed ID: 21691458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison between different cost devices for digital capture of X-ray films: an image characteristics detection approach.
Salazar AJ; Camacho JC; Aguirre DA
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 21614654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison between differently priced devices for digital capture of X-ray films using computed tomography as a gold standard: a multireader-multicase receiver operating characteristic curve study.
Salazar AJ; Camacho JC; Aguirre DA
Telemed J E Health; 2011 May; 17(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 21457011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.
Metz CE
Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jan; 1(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20821157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
