349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10954638)
1. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis.
Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Cailliet R; Troyanovich SJ; Janik TJ; Holland B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(16):2072-8. PubMed ID: 10954638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods.
Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Cailliet R; Janik TJ; Holland B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jun; 26(11):E235-42. PubMed ID: 11389407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis.
Harrison DE; Cailliet R; Harrison DD; Janik TJ; Holland B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jun; 26(11):E227-34. PubMed ID: 11389406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling of the sagittal cervical spine as a method to discriminate hypolordosis: results of elliptical and circular modeling in 72 asymptomatic subjects, 52 acute neck pain subjects, and 70 chronic neck pain subjects.
Harrison DD; Harrison DE; Janik TJ; Cailliet R; Ferrantelli JR; Haas JW; Holland B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(22):2485-92. PubMed ID: 15543059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Further reliability analysis of the Harrison radiographic line-drawing methods: crossed ICCs for lateral posterior tangents and modified Risser-Ferguson method on AP views.
Harrison DE; Holland B; Harrison DD; Janik TJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2002 Feb; 25(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 11896376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of cervical lordosis measurement techniques on long-cassette radiographs.
Janusz P; Tyrakowski M; Yu H; Siemionow K
Eur Spine J; 2016 Nov; 25(11):3596-3601. PubMed ID: 26707132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of lumbar lordosis measurement in patients with spondylolisthesis: a case-control study comparing the Cobb, centroid, and posterior tangent methods.
Hwang JH; Modi HN; Suh SW; Hong JY; Park YH; Park JH; Yang JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(18):1691-700. PubMed ID: 20543767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Reliabilities of Radiographic Measurements of Cervical Sagittal Alignment in Ankylosing Spondylitis.
Shin JK; Lee JS; Kang SS; Lee JM; Youn BH
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Jul; 29(6):E282-7. PubMed ID: 25137147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical significance of cervical vertebral flexion and extension spatial alignment changes.
Xu-hui Z; Jia-hu F; Lian-shun J; Zhi-yong C; Yong Z; Xiong-sheng C; Wei-ping W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E21-6. PubMed ID: 19127144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliabilities of and correlations among five standard methods of assessing the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine.
Ohara A; Miyamoto K; Naganawa T; Matsumoto K; Shimizu K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(22):2585-91; discussion 2592. PubMed ID: 17047548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do sagittal plane anatomical variations (angulation) of the cervical facets and C2 odontoid affect the geometrical configuration of the cervical lordosis?
Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Haas JW; Janik TJ; Holland B
Clin Anat; 2005 Mar; 18(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 15696531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increasing the cervical lordosis with chiropractic biophysics seated combined extension-compression and transverse load cervical traction with cervical manipulation: nonrandomized clinical control trial.
Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Betz JJ; Janik TJ; Holland B; Colloca CJ; Haas JW
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(3):139-51. PubMed ID: 12704306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case-control study comparing 6 methods.
Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Park JH
Eur Spine J; 2010 Sep; 19(9):1551-7. PubMed ID: 20437183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. C7 sagittal vertical axis is the determinant of the C5-C7 angle in cervical sagittal alignment.
Matsubayashi Y; Chikuda H; Oshima Y; Taniguchi Y; Fujimoto Y; Shimizu T; Tanaka S
Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):622-626. PubMed ID: 27871819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Radiographic Analysis of Cervical Sagittal Alignment in Adolescent Idiopathic Cervical Kyphosis.
Shen XL; Tian Y; Zhou XH; Ren D; Cao P; Yuan W
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jun; 30(5):E560-E566. PubMed ID: 28525478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of accuracy of kyphotic angle measurement for vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures.
Lee SW; Hong JT; Son BC; Sung JH; Kim IS; Park CK
J Clin Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 14(10):961-5. PubMed ID: 17646103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic Cervical Radiographs in Patients with Hirayama Disease: An Unneglectable Factor on the Choice of Surgery Options.
Wang H; Sun C; Yang S; Jiang J; Lu F; Ma X; Xia X
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e433-e440. PubMed ID: 29530702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical lordosis: the effect of age and gender.
Been E; Shefi S; Soudack M
Spine J; 2017 Jun; 17(6):880-888. PubMed ID: 28254673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of lateral bending and axial rotation with validity of a new method to determine axial rotation on anteroposterior cervical radiographs.
Janik T; Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Holland B; Coleman RR; Payne MR
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Sep; 24(7):445-8. PubMed ID: 11562652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chiropractic biophysics lateral cervical film analysis reliability.
Jackson BL; Harrison DD; Robertson GA; Barker WF
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1993; 16(6):384-91. PubMed ID: 8409786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
