323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10954770)
1. What recourse? Liability for managed-care decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(8):592-6. PubMed ID: 10954770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Emerging legal issues.
Marren JP
Manag Care Q; 1998; 6(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10181707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The people vs HMOs.
Howe RF
Time; 1999 Feb; 153(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 10345773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health plan liability.
Coleman D
Healthplan; 1997; 38(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10176856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilization review and managed health care liability.
Spector RA
South Med J; 2004 Mar; 97(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 15043337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Texas Health Care Liability Act: Texas is the first state to listen to the concerns of its health care consumers, but how much has it heard?
McCabe KM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 16(2):565-95. PubMed ID: 10970185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Marketplace. State lawmakers consider keeping HMOs in line through malpractice suits.
Moskowitz DB
Med Health; 1998 Feb; 52(6):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10176439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pegram's regress: a missed chance for sensible judicial review of managed care decisions.
Cahill MT; Jacobson PD
Am J Law Med; 2001; 27(4):421-38. PubMed ID: 11837143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. ERISA preemption and regulation of managed health care: the case for managed federalism.
Farrell MG
Am J Law Med; 1997; 23(2-3):251-89. PubMed ID: 9262757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Groping for the reins: ERISA, HMO malpractice, and enterprise liability.
Kilcullen JK
Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(1):7-50. PubMed ID: 8819595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal liability, denial of benefits and managed care.
Empey CS; Cwiek M
Mich Health Hosp; 1999; 35(5):30-1. PubMed ID: 10621029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Liability of managed care organizations expands.
Devlin MM
J Med Pract Manage; 1999; 15(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 10725048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The thin line between malpractice and benefit determination.
Rovner JA; Hewitt DG
Manag Care; 2003 Apr; 12(4):31-2. PubMed ID: 12747026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Vicarious liability: is ERISA preemption a successful defense?
Lederberg MB
Med Health R I; 1997 Feb; 80(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 9046780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pegram v. Herdrich. A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision threatens patients and physicians.
Geist RW
Minn Med; 2002 Jul; 85(7):6, 58-9. PubMed ID: 12152532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Workers of the world, panic!
Parloff R
Fortune; 2004 Jul; 150(1):36, 38. PubMed ID: 15270460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Finance issue brief: insurer liability: year end report-2003.
MacEachern L
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 14964230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Erb CT; Rich RF
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15647587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
