These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10954854)

  • 1. Behavior of M-phase synchronized blastomeres after nuclear transfer in cattle.
    Alberio R; Motlik J; Stojkovic M; Wolf E; Zakhartchenko V
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2000 Sep; 57(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 10954854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of time after the removal of nocodazole from nuclear donors on the development of reconstituted embryos in bovine nuclear transplantation.
    Tanaka H; Takahashi Y; Hishinuma M; Kanagawa H
    Jpn J Vet Res; 1995 Dec; 43(3-4):135-43. PubMed ID: 8901030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of nocodazole on the development of donor blastomeres from 16-cell stage bovine embryos in nuclear transfer.
    Tanaka H; Takahashi Y; Hishinuma M; Kanagawa H; Kariya T
    Jpn J Vet Res; 1995 Jun; 43(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 7474643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nuclear transfer in sheep embryos: the effect of cell-cycle coordination between nucleus and cytoplasm and the use of in vitro matured oocytes.
    Liu L; Dai Y; Moor RM
    Mol Reprod Dev; 1997 Jul; 47(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 9170105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Premature chromosome condensation is not essential for nuclear reprogramming in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer.
    Sung LY; Shen PC; Jeong BS; Xu J; Chang CC; Cheng WT; Wu JS; Lee SN; Broek D; Faber D; Tian XC; Yang X; Du F
    Biol Reprod; 2007 Feb; 76(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 17108336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bovine nuclear transfer embryos: oocyte activation prior to blastomere fusion.
    Stice SL; Keefer CL; Matthews L
    Mol Reprod Dev; 1994 May; 38(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8049067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of activation time on the nuclear remodeling and in vitro development of nuclear transfer embryos derived from bovine somatic cells.
    Choi JY; Kim CI; Park CK; Yang BK; Cheong HT
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2004 Nov; 69(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 15349840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nuclear transfer of synchronized african wild cat somatic cells into enucleated domestic cat oocytes.
    Gómez MC; Jenkins JA; Giraldo A; Harris RF; King A; Dresser BL; Pope CE
    Biol Reprod; 2003 Sep; 69(3):1032-41. PubMed ID: 12773426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of recipient oocyte cell cycle stage on DNA synthesis, nuclear envelope breakdown, chromosome constitution, and development in nuclear transplant bovine embryos.
    Barnes FL; Collas P; Powell R; King WA; Westhusin M; Shepherd D
    Mol Reprod Dev; 1993 Sep; 36(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 8398128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nuclear remodelling and early development in cryopreserved, porcine primordial germ cells following nuclear transfer into in vitro-matured oocytes.
    Liu L; Moor RM; Laurie S; Notarianni E
    Int J Dev Biol; 1995 Aug; 39(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 8619962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of activation treatments of recipient oocytes on subsequent development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos.
    Atabay EC; Katagiri S; Nagano M; Takahashi Y
    Jpn J Vet Res; 2003 Feb; 50(4):185-94. PubMed ID: 12675554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Full-term development of rat after transfer of nuclei from two-cell stage embryos.
    Popova E; Bader M; Krivokharchenko A
    Biol Reprod; 2006 Oct; 75(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 16807380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nuclear and microtubule reorganization in nuclear-transferred bovine embryos.
    Shin MR; Park SW; Shim H; Kim NH
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2002 May; 62(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 11933163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developmental potential of bovine nuclear transfer embryos and postnatal survival rate of cloned calves produced by two different timings of fusion and activation.
    Akagi S; Adachi N; Matsukawa K; Kubo M; Takahashi S
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2003 Nov; 66(3):264-72. PubMed ID: 14502605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of recipient cytoplasm cell stage on transcription in bovine nucleus transfer embryos.
    Smith SD; Soloy E; Kanka J; Holm P; Callesen H
    Mol Reprod Dev; 1996 Dec; 45(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 8956282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the timing of blastomere isolation after the removal of nocodazole in bovine nuclear transfer.
    Tanaka H
    Theriogenology; 1999 May; 51(7):1225-37. PubMed ID: 10729087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Activated bovine cytoplasts prepared by demecolcine-induced enucleation support development of nuclear transfer embryos in vitro.
    Russell DF; Ibáñez E; Albertini DF; Overström EW
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2005 Oct; 72(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 16007680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transfer of nuclei from 8-cell stage mouse embryos following use of nocodazole to control the cell cycle.
    Otaegui PJ; O'Neill GT; Campbell KH; Wilmut I
    Mol Reprod Dev; 1994 Oct; 39(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 7826615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors involved in nuclear reprogramming during early development in the rabbit.
    Pinto-Correia C; Long CR; Chang T; Robl JM
    Mol Reprod Dev; 1995 Mar; 40(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 7772339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nucleolar ultrastructure in bovine nuclear transfer embryos.
    Kanka J; Smith SD; Soloy E; Holm P; Callesen H
    Mol Reprod Dev; 1999 Mar; 52(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 10206656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.