These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10955046)

  • 21. Formative research of a quick list for an automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recall.
    Subar AF; Thompson FE; Potischman N; Forsyth BH; Buday R; Richards D; McNutt S; Hull SG; Guenther PM; Schatzkin A; Baranowski T
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 Jun; 107(6):1002-7. PubMed ID: 17524721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Telephone vs face-to-face interviews for quantitative food frequency assessment.
    Lyu LC; Hankin JH; Liu LQ; Wilkens LR; Lee JH; Goodman MT; Kolonel LN
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1998 Jan; 98(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 9434650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pictogram-based method of visualizing dietary intake.
    Liu Y; Chiu S; Lin Y; Chiou WK
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(6):493-500. PubMed ID: 25301223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative advantage of 3-day food records over 24-hour recall and 5-day food frequency validated by observation of 9- and 10-year-old girls.
    Crawford PB; Obarzanek E; Morrison J; Sabry ZI
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Jun; 94(6):626-30. PubMed ID: 8195550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of portion size in children's dietary assessment: lessons learnt.
    Foster E; Adamson AJ; Anderson AS; Barton KL; Wrieden WL
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2009 Feb; 63 Suppl 1():S45-9. PubMed ID: 19190643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The estimation of food portion sizes: a comparison between using descriptions of portion sizes and a photographic food atlas by children and adults.
    Frobisher C; Maxwell SM
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2003 Jun; 16(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 12753111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validity of telephoned diet recalls and records for assessment of individual food intake.
    Krantzler NJ; Mullen BJ; Schutz HG; Grivetti LE; Holden CA; Meiselman HL
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1982 Dec; 36(6):1234-42. PubMed ID: 7148742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Children's estimates of food portion size: the effect of timing of dietary interview on the accuracy of children's portion size estimates.
    Foster E; O'Keeffe M; Matthews JN; Mathers JC; Nelson M; Barton KL; Wrieden WL; Adamson AJ
    Br J Nutr; 2008 Jan; 99(1):185-90. PubMed ID: 17651522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Food photographs in portion size estimation among adolescent Mozambican girls.
    Korkalo L; Erkkola M; Fidalgo L; Nevalainen J; Mutanen M
    Public Health Nutr; 2013 Sep; 16(9):1558-64. PubMed ID: 22874096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Portion size estimation aids for Asian foods.
    Thoradeniya T; de Silva A; Arambepola C; Atukorala S; Lanerolle P
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2012 Oct; 25(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 22500981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relationship between portion size and energy intake among infants and toddlers: evidence of self-regulation.
    Fox MK; Devaney B; Reidy K; Razafindrakoto C; Ziegler P
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Jan; 106(1 Suppl 1):S77-83. PubMed ID: 16376632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of a method for the estimation of food portion size.
    Faggiano F; Vineis P; Cravanzola D; Pisani P; Xompero G; Riboli E; Kaaks R
    Epidemiology; 1992 Jul; 3(4):379-82. PubMed ID: 1637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Foods commonly eaten in the United States, 1989-1991 and 1994-1996: are portion sizes changing?
    Smiciklas-Wright H; Mitchell DC; Mickle SJ; Goldman JD; Cook A
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Jan; 103(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 12525792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of 24-hour recalls assisted by food records in third-grade children. The CATCH Collaborative Group.
    Lytle LA; Nichaman MZ; Obarzanek E; Glovsky E; Montgomery D; Nicklas T; Zive M; Feldman H
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1993 Dec; 93(12):1431-6. PubMed ID: 8245378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The validity of a telephone-administered 24-hour dietary recall methodology.
    Posner BM; Borman CL; Morgan JL; Borden WS; Ohls JC
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1982 Sep; 36(3):546-53. PubMed ID: 6180624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water.
    Tran KM; Johnson RK; Soultanakis RP; Matthews DE
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Jul; 100(7):777-83. PubMed ID: 10916515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of food photographs for quantifying food servings in a lunch meal setting among Danish children and adults.
    Biltoft-Jensen A; Holmgaard Nielsen T; Hess Ygil K; Christensen T; Fagt S
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2018 Feb; 31(1):131-140. PubMed ID: 28656744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimated portion sizes of snacks and beverages differ from reference amounts and are affected by appetite status in non-obese men.
    Brogden N; Almiron-Roig E
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Oct; 14(10):1743-51. PubMed ID: 21466743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. WebDASC: a web-based dietary assessment software for 8-11-year-old Danish children.
    Biltoft-Jensen A; Trolle E; Christensen T; Islam N; Andersen LF; Egenfeldt-Nielsen S; Tetens I
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2014 Jan; 27 Suppl 1():43-53. PubMed ID: 22594587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Interviewer Help Answering the Time Tradeoff.
    Edelaar-Peeters Y; Stiggelbout AM; Van Den Hout WB
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):655-65. PubMed ID: 24668419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.