These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10955413)
1. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: meta-analyses of published studies, 1974-1990. Gareen IF; Greenland S; Morgenstern H Epidemiology; 2000 Sep; 11(5):589-97. PubMed ID: 10955413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings. Mumford SD; Kessel E Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1151-76. PubMed ID: 1601137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconsidering the IUD. Petitti DB Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 1601123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Another look at the Dalkon Shield: meta-analysis underscores its problems. Sivin I Contraception; 1993 Jul; 48(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 8403900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pelvic inflammatory disease with intrauterine device use: a reassessment. Kessel E Fertil Steril; 1989 Jan; 51(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2642807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term study of the safety of the Dalkon Shield and Gyne-T 200 intrauterine devices. Rioux JE; Cloutier D; Dupont P; Lamonde D CMAJ; 1986 Apr; 134(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 3948091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of different types of intrauterine devices on the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. Kaufman DW; Watson J; Rosenberg L; Helmrich SP; Miller DR; Miettinen OS; Stolley PD; Shapiro S JAMA; 1983 Aug; 250(6):759-62. PubMed ID: 6876331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of PID 5x greater from Dalkon Shield than from other IUDs. Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):225-6. PubMed ID: 6653739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Dalkon Shield debate. Goodhue PA Conn Med; 1983 Mar; 47(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 6851548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Earth, motherhood, and the intrauterine device. Eschenbach DA Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1177-9. PubMed ID: 1601138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. Lee NC; Rubin GL; Ory HW; Burkman RT Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jul; 62(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 6856209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: evolving perspectives on the data. Burkman RT Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1996 Dec; 51(12 Suppl):S35-41. PubMed ID: 8972501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Epidemiology of pelvic inflammatory disease in parous women with special reference to intrauterine device use. Buchan H; Villard-Mackintosh L; Vessey M; Yeates D; McPherson K Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Sep; 97(9):780-8. PubMed ID: 2242362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective. Farley TM; Rosenberg MJ; Rowe PJ; Chen JH; Meirik O Lancet; 1992 Mar; 339(8796):785-8. PubMed ID: 1347812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The role of intrauterine contraceptive devices in the development of inflammatory processes in the small pelvis]. Batar I Orv Hetil; 1986 Aug; 127(32):1923-8. PubMed ID: 3763205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical experience with intrauterine devices in a private practice. Hasson HM Adv Contracept; 1985 Mar; 1(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 3842212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pelvic infection: a comparison of the Dalkon shield and three other intrauterine devices. Snowden R; Pearson B Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 May; 288(6430):1570-3. PubMed ID: 6426647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]