102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10956399)
1. Call and recall for cervical cancer screening in a developing country: a randomised field trial.
Torres-Mejía G; Salmerón-Castro J; Téllez-Rojo MM; Lazcano-Ponce EC; Juárez-Márquez SA; Torres-Torija I; Gil-Abadíe L; Buiatti E
Int J Cancer; 2000 Sep; 87(6):869-73. PubMed ID: 10956399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics of respondents to a cervical cancer screening program in a developing country.
Torres-Mejía G; Salmerón-Castro J; Téllez-Rojo MM; Lazcano-Ponce EC; Juárez-Márquez SA; Torres-Torija I; Gil-Abadíe L
Arch Med Res; 2002; 33(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 12031637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Buehler SK; Parsons WL
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer.
Eaker S; Adami HO; Granath F; Wilander E; Sparén P
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 15006907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How much does a reminder letter increase cervical screening among under-screened women in NSW?
Morrell S; Taylor R; Zeckendorf S; Niciak A; Wain G; Ross J
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 29(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 15782877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cancer screening: a comparison of recruitment strategies among older women.
Mitchell H; Hirst S; Cockburn J; Reading DJ; Staples MP; Medley G
Med J Aust; 1991 Jul; 155(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 1857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters.
Decker KM; Turner D; Demers AA; Martens PJ; Lambert P; Chateau D
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Aug; 22(8):687-93. PubMed ID: 23915107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A mobile unit: an effective service for cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Tatip Y; Boonmak C
Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Feb; 28(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10195661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Organised Versus Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban and Rural Regions of Lithuania.
Paulauskiene J; Ivanauskiene R; Skrodeniene E; Petkeviciene J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Sep; 55(9):. PubMed ID: 31500116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Patient Reminders on Papanicolaou Test Completion for High-Risk Patients Identified by a Clinical Decision Support System.
MacLaughlin KL; Kessler ME; Komandur Elayavilli R; Hickey BC; Scheitel MR; Wagholikar KB; Liu H; Kremers WK; Chaudhry R
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 May; 27(5):569-574. PubMed ID: 29297754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Lerdlukanavonge P; Koonchote S
Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Jun; 24(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 7672887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How reminders given to patients and physicians affected pap smear use in a health maintenance organization: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Burack RC; Gimotty PA; George J; McBride S; Moncrease A; Simon MS; Dews P; Coombs J
Cancer; 1998 Jun; 82(12):2391-400. PubMed ID: 9635532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomised controlled trial of strategies to prompt attendance for a Pap smear.
Bowman J; Sanson-Fisher R; Boyle C; Pope S; Redman S
J Med Screen; 1995; 2(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 8719151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening.
Adab P; Marshall T; Rouse A; Randhawa B; Sangha H; Bhangoo N
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2003 Aug; 57(8):589-93. PubMed ID: 12883063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the phone call the most effective method for recall in cervical cancer screening?--results from a randomised control trial.
Abdul Rashid RM; Mohamed M; Hamid ZA; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5901-4. PubMed ID: 24289597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
