These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10958374)

  • 1. A new impedance cardiograph device for the non-invasive evaluation of cardiac output at rest and during exercise: comparison with the "direct" Fick method.
    Charloux A; Lonsdorfer-Wolf E; Richard R; Lampert E; Oswald-Mammosser M; Mettauer B; Geny B; Lonsdorfer J
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2000 Jul; 82(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 10958374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-invasive cardiac output evaluation during a maximal progressive exercise test, using a new impedance cardiograph device.
    Richard R; Lonsdorfer-Wolf E; Charloux A; Doutreleau S; Buchheit M; Oswald-Mammosser M; Lampert E; Mettauer B; Geny B; Lonsdorfer J
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2001 Aug; 85(3-4):202-7. PubMed ID: 11560071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does thoracic bioimpedance accurately determine cardiac output in COPD patients during maximal or intermittent exercise?
    Bougault V; Lonsdorfer-Wolf E; Charloux A; Richard R; Geny B; Oswald-Mammosser M
    Chest; 2005 Apr; 127(4):1122-31. PubMed ID: 15821184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of cardiac output with non-invasive Aesculon impedance versus thermodilution.
    Petter H; Erik A; Björn E; Göran R
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 21143753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of two methods for continuous cardiac output assessment during exercise in chronic heart failure patients.
    Kemps HM; Thijssen EJ; Schep G; Sleutjes BT; De Vries WR; Hoogeveen AR; Wijn PF; Doevendans PA
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Dec; 105(6):1822-9. PubMed ID: 18948448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiac output measurement during exercise in COPD: A comparison of dye dilution and impedance cardiography.
    Louvaris Z; Spetsioti S; Andrianopoulos V; Chynkiamis N; Habazettl H; Wagner H; Zakynthinos S; Wagner PD; Vogiatzis I
    Clin Respir J; 2019 Apr; 13(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 30724023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: comparison of the CO2-rebreathing method and electrical impedance cardiography.
    Bogaard HJ; Hamersma WB; Horsch JL; Woltjer HH; Postmus PE; de Vries PM
    Physiol Meas; 1997 Nov; 18(4):327-38. PubMed ID: 9413866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of impedance cardiography: comparison of NCCOM3-R7 with Fick and thermodilution methods.
    Yakimets J; Jensen L
    Heart Lung; 1995; 24(3):194-206. PubMed ID: 7622393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac output during exercise: a comparison of four methods.
    Siebenmann C; Rasmussen P; Sørensen H; Zaar M; Hvidtfeldt M; Pichon A; Secher NH; Lundby C
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2015 Feb; 25(1):e20-7. PubMed ID: 24646113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Validation during exercise of a new device for cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time (comparison EsCCO(®) vs. Physioflow(®))].
    Stalter A; Lanot N; Bridon G; Julian V; Péreira B; Richard R
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2016 Feb; 65(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 25704727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
    Engoren M; Barbee D
    Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of impedance cardiography in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
    Panagiotou M; Vogiatzis I; Jayasekera G; Louvaris Z; Mackenzie A; Mcglinchey N; Baker JS; Church AC; Peacock AJ; Johnson MK
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Mar; 38(2):254-260. PubMed ID: 28168802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of cardiac output by thoracic impedance and direct fick in children with congenital heart disease undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization.
    Taylor K; La Rotta G; McCrindle BW; Manlhiot C; Redington A; Holtby H
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):776-9. PubMed ID: 21684761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
    Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output during exercise by inductance cardiography.
    Kaplan V; Bucklar GB; Bloch KE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):747-52. PubMed ID: 12750583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of cardiac output using Physio Flow with different positions of electrode placement.
    Tan KH; Lai FO; Hwang NC
    Singapore Med J; 2006 Nov; 47(11):967-70. PubMed ID: 17075665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of exercise cardiac output by thoracic impedance in healthy children.
    Pianosi PT
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 Aug; 92(4-5):425-30. PubMed ID: 15221404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance and bioreactance methods at rest and during exercise.
    Jakovljevic DG; Moore S; Hallsworth K; Fattakhova G; Thoma C; Trenell MI
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2012 Apr; 26(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 22234400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impedance cardiography for monitoring changes in cardiac output.
    Parashar R; Bajpai M; Goyal M; Singh S; Tiwari S; Narayan VS
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 23387239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New ambulatory impedance cardiograph validated against the Minnesota Impedance Cardiograph.
    Nakonezny PA; Kowalewski RB; Ernst JM; Hawkley LC; Lozano DL; Litvack DA; Berntson GG; Sollers JJ; Kizakevich P; Cacioppo JT; Lovallo WR
    Psychophysiology; 2001 May; 38(3):465-73. PubMed ID: 11352134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.