These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10958424)
1. Comparisons of bone volumes and densities relating to osseointegrated implants in microvascularly reconstructed mandibles: a study of cadaveric radius and fibula bones. Klesper B; Wahn J; Koebke J J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 28(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 10958424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinicoanatomic examination of the fibula: anatomic basis for dental implant placement. Matsuura M; Ohno K; Michi K; Egawa K; Takiguchi R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):879-84. PubMed ID: 10612927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immediate loading of dental implants placed in revascularized fibula free flaps: a clinical report on 2 consecutive patients. Chiapasco M; Gatti C Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):906-12. PubMed ID: 15623070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Osseointegrated implants: a comparative study of bone thickness in four vascularized bone flaps. Frodel JL; Funk GF; Capper DT; Fridrich KL; Blumer JR; Haller JR; Hoffman HT Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Sep; 92(3):449-55; discussion 456-8. PubMed ID: 8341743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary stability of simultaneously placed dental implants in extraoral donor graft sites: a human cadaver study. Akkocaoglu M; Cehreli MC; Tekdemir I; Comert A; Güzel E; Dağdeviren A; Akca K J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 65(3):400-7. PubMed ID: 17307584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant prosthodontic rehabilitation of fibula free-flap reconstructed mandibles: a Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center review of prognostic factors and implant outcomes. Teoh KH; Huryn JM; Patel S; Halpern J; Tunick S; Wong HB; Zlotolow IM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 16274148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants placed without flap reflection in the canine mandible. Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 May; 105(5):561-5. PubMed ID: 18299237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients. Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Part II. Mandibular reconstruction: combined intra-oral and in vitro placement of osseointegrated implants into a free and vascularized bone graft. Stoler A; Hill T J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 1289541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study. Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients. Friberg B; Jemt T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interface of unloaded titanium implants in the iliac crest, fibula, and scapula: a histomorphometric and biomechanical study in the pig. Rohner D; Tay A; Chung SM; Hutmacher DW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 14982355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomical considerations of the Thai fibula used as a fibula osteocutaneous free flap in mandibular reconstruction and dental implant placement. Apinhasmit W; Sinpitaksakul P; Chompoopong S J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Apr; 95(4):561-8. PubMed ID: 22612012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Outcome of oral implants after autogenous bone reconstruction]. Kamal D; Abida S; Jammet P; Goudot P; Yachouh J Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 19327803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insertional torque and axial pull-out strength of mini-implants in mandibles of dogs. Salmória KK; Tanaka OM; Guariza-Filho O; Camargo ES; de Souza LT; Maruo H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e15-22. PubMed ID: 18538236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis. Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of the placement of endosseous implants in vascularized bone grafts on bone union in beagle dogs. Kobayashi E; Ishihara O; Mataga I Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 34(6):659-67. PubMed ID: 16053891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone-to-implant apposition with machined and MTX microtextured implant surfaces in human sinus grafts. Trisi P; Marcato C; Todisco M Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Oct; 23(5):427-37. PubMed ID: 14620117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Endo-Distractor for preimplant mandibular regeneration. Krenkel C; Grunert I Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Feb; 110(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 19135219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The comparison of usefulness prosthetic rehabilitation with removable and fixed suprastructures on endosseous implants. Jabłoński D Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2004; 50(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 16871751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]