224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10959914)
1. A two-stage dose selection strategy in phase I trials with wide dose ranges.
Wang O; Faries DE
J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Aug; 10(3):319-33. PubMed ID: 10959914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
Paoletti X; Kramar A
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A logistic dose-ranging method for phase I clinical investigations trials.
Murphy JR; Hall DL
J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Nov; 7(4):635-47. PubMed ID: 9358335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology--a simulation study.
Gerke O; Siedentop H
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5329-44. PubMed ID: 17849502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Bayesian evaluation of enrolling additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose in Phase I trials.
Gönen M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 15837436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dose-cohort designs in cancer phase I trials.
Huang B; Chappell R
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2070-93. PubMed ID: 17764082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.
Normolle D; Lawrence T
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Sep; 24(27):4426-33. PubMed ID: 16983110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials. Dose escalation with overdose control.
Tighiouart M; Rogatko A; Babb JS
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(14):2183-96. PubMed ID: 15909291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. np1: a computer program for dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials.
Kramar A; Houédé N; Paoletti X
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Oct; 88(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 17719124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved designs for dose escalation studies using pharmacokinetic measurements.
Piantadosi S; Liu G
Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(15):1605-18. PubMed ID: 8858785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of the continual reassessment method to a phase I dose-finding trial in Japanese patients: East meets West.
Morita S
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2090-7. PubMed ID: 21500239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian decision procedures for dose-escalation based on evidence of undesirable events and therapeutic benefit.
Whitehead J; Zhou Y; Stevens J; Blakey G; Price J; Leadbetter J
Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 16342336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of dose-finding studies to observation errors.
Zohar S; O'Quigley J
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Nov; 30(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 19580886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical modifications of the continual reassessment method for phase I cancer clinical trials.
Faries D
J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Jul; 4(2):147-64. PubMed ID: 7951271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phase I (or phase II) dose-ranging clinical trials: proposal of a two-stage Bayesian design.
Zohar S; Chevret S
J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 12635905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Continual reassessment method for dose escalation clinical trials in oncology: a comparison of prior skeleton approaches using AZD3514 data.
James GD; Symeonides SN; Marshall J; Young J; Clack G
BMC Cancer; 2016 Aug; 16(1):703. PubMed ID: 27581751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A model-based approach in the estimation of the maximum tolerated dose in phase I cancer clinical trials.
He W; Liu J; Binkowitz B; Quan H
Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(12):2027-42. PubMed ID: 16025542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs.
Oron AP; Hoff PD
Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 23345304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An optimization algorithm for designing phase I cancer clinical trials.
Jiang H; Liu Y; Su Z
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Mar; 29(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 17681867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Posterior maximization and averaging for Bayesian working model choice in the continual reassessment method.
Daimon T; Zohar S; O'Quigley J
Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1563-73. PubMed ID: 21351288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
