These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. [Computerized three-dimensional reconstruction and morphologic measurement of adult acetabulum bone structure]. Dong JD; Wang Y; Zhu ZA; Gu DY; Xue WD; Dai KR Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Dec; 43(24):1583-6. PubMed ID: 16412306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Quantitative Computerized Assessment of the Degree of Acetabular Bone Deficiency: Total radial Acetabular Bone Loss (TrABL). Gelaude F; Clijmans T; Delport H Adv Orthop; 2011; 2011():494382. PubMed ID: 22013539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of the feasibility of acetabular cup pre-determination in revision total hip arthroplasty via X-ray of the bone stock of the anterosuperior acetabulum. Zhang J; Kong K; Chi Y; Liu X; Zeng Y; Li H J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 16(1):597. PubMed ID: 34649561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of 3D Printing Rapid Prototyping Technology with Traditional Radiographs in Evaluating Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective and Consecutive Study. Zhang JW; Liu XL; Zeng YM; Zhai ZJ; Mao YQ; Yu DG; Wang L; Yan MN; Zhu ZN; Li HW Orthop Surg; 2021 Aug; 13(6):1773-1780. PubMed ID: 34409750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Reliability and Validity of Acetabular and Femoral Bone Loss Classification Systems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Gu A; Adriani M; Malahias MA; Fassihi SC; Nocon AA; Bostrom MP; Sculco PK HSS J; 2020 Oct; 16(3):288-295. PubMed ID: 33088242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The effect of metal artefact on the design of custom 3D printed acetabular implants. Di Laura A; Henckel J; Wescott R; Hothi H; Hart AJ 3D Print Med; 2020 Aug; 6(1):23. PubMed ID: 32845428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Virtual preoperative planning and 3D printing are valuable for the management of complex orthopaedic trauma. Mishra A; Verma T; Vaish A; Vaish R; Vaishya R; Maini L Chin J Traumatol; 2019 Dec; 22(6):350-355. PubMed ID: 31668700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Accuracy and precision of measurements performed on three-dimensional printed pelvises when compared to computed tomography measurements. Larguier L; Hespel AM; Jamet N; Mercier E; Jouan D; Jardel N; Larrat S J Vet Sci; 2019 May; 20(3):e22. PubMed ID: 31161740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing techniques for the surgical management of acetabular fractures. Hsu CL; Chou YC; Li YT; Chen JE; Hung CC; Wu CC; Shen HC; Yeh TT Int Orthop; 2019 Aug; 43(8):1969-1976. PubMed ID: 30128670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Conventional plate fixation method versus pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing-assisted contoured plate fixation method in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture. Hung CC; Li YT; Chou YC; Chen JE; Wu CC; Shen HC; Yeh TT Int Orthop; 2019 Feb; 43(2):425-431. PubMed ID: 29725736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Error Analysis: How Precise is Fused Deposition Modeling in Fabrication of Bone Models in Comparison to the Parent Bones? Reddy MV; Eachempati K; Gurava Reddy AV; Mugalur A Indian J Orthop; 2018; 52(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29576649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Utility of Radiographs, Computed Tomography, and Three Dimensional Computed Tomography Pelvis Reconstruction for Identification of Acetabular Defects in Residency Training. Plate JF; Shields JS; Langfitt MK; Bolognesi MP; Lang JE; Seyler TM Hip Pelvis; 2017 Dec; 29(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 29250499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Putting 3D modelling and 3D printing into practice: virtual surgery and preoperative planning to reconstruct complex post-traumatic skeletal deformities and defects. Tetsworth K; Block S; Glatt V SICOT J; 2017; 3():16. PubMed ID: 28220752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]