These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10960624)
21. Does cerclage location influence perinatal outcome? Rust OA; Atlas RO; Meyn J; Wells M; Kimmel S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 189(6):1688-91. PubMed ID: 14710099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch for transvaginal cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention. Giraldo-Isaza MA; Fried GP; Hegarty SE; Suescum-Diaz MA; Cohen AW; Berghella V Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 208(3):209.e1-9. PubMed ID: 23201330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does the presence of a funnel increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in a patient with a short cervix? Rust OA; Atlas RO; Kimmel S; Roberts WE; Hess LW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1060-6. PubMed ID: 15846180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: review of the literature. Rozenberg P; Gillet A; Ville Y Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):302-11. PubMed ID: 11896957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Berghella V; Odibo AO; To MS; Rust OA; Althuisius SM Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):181-9. PubMed ID: 15994635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of preterm birth by second trimester cervical sonography in twin pregnancies. Yang JH; Kuhlman K; Daly S; Berghella V Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 15(4):288-91. PubMed ID: 10895446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Controversies regarding cervical incompetence, short cervix, and the need for cerclage. Althuisius S; Dekker G Clin Perinatol; 2004 Dec; 31(4):695-720, v-vi. PubMed ID: 15519424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Indications for and pregnancy outcomes of cervical cerclage: 11-year comparison of patients undergoing history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated, or rescue cerclage. Chan LL; Leung TW; Lo TK; Lau WL; Leung WC Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 26183455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Does post operative sonographic position of preventive cervical cerclage affect gestational age at birth?]. Melle L; Le Ray C; Delorme P; Anselem O; Goffinet F; Marcellin L Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Dec; 44(12):679-684. PubMed ID: 27836521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage. Guzman ER; Forster JK; Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Walters C; Gipson K Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 12(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 9819870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Guzman ER; Walters C; Ananth CV; O'Reilly-Green C; Benito CW; Palermo A; Vintzileos AM Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Sep; 18(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 11555447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is there value for serial ultrasonographic assessment of cervical lengths after a cerclage? Hedriana HL; Lanouette JM; Haesslein HC; McLean LK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):705.e1-6; discussion 705.e6. PubMed ID: 18448079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pregnancy outcomes and factors affecting the clinical effects of cervical cerclage when used for different indications: A retrospective study of 326 cases. Chen R; Huang X; Li B Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 32039796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]