These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10960753)

  • 21. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage of Compoglass-F and Dyract-AP compomers in Class V preparations after salivary contamination.
    Evancusky JW; Meiers JC
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10730285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal hybrid layer in Class V restorations.
    Prati C; Pashley DH; Chersoni S; Mongiorgi R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 11203821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of surface conditioning and restorative material on the shear bond strength and resin-dentin interface of a new one-bottle nanofilled adhesive.
    Sunico MC; Shinkai K; Medina VO; Shirono M; Tanaka N; Katoh Y
    Dent Mater; 2002 Nov; 18(7):535-42. PubMed ID: 12191667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study.
    Schuckar M; Geurtsen W
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):766-75. PubMed ID: 9372468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of dentin deproteinization on microleakage of Class V composite restorations.
    Toledano M; Perdigão J; Osorio R; Osorio E
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 11203862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite Class II restorations.
    Dietschi D; Bindi G; Krejci I; Davidson C
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):500-9. PubMed ID: 12216570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Enamel and dentin bond strength and bonding mechanism to dentin of Gluma CPS to primary teeth.
    Fritz U; García-Godoy F; Finger WJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9096816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal adaptation to enamel of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Dec; 1(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9555215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Marginal adaptation of self-etching adhesives in Class II cavities.
    Ernst CP; Streicher S; Willershausen B
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 12666758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: a 3-year retrospective study.
    Prati C; Chersoni S; Cretti L; Montanari G
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec; 2(4):168-73. PubMed ID: 10388389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bond strengths of Dyract AP compomer material to dentin of permanent and primary molars: phosphoric acid versus non-rinse conditioner.
    Baghdadi ZD
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 14528776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.