These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10961225)

  • 1. [Reduction of radiation dosage by using digital luminescence radiography on a hand phantom].
    Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Adler R; Freesmeyer M; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2000 Apr; 172(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 10961225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
    Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Reduction of radiation exposure by using storage phosphor radiography on pelvis and lumbar spine].
    Heyne JP; Sehner J; Neumann R; Werner B; Adler R; Freesmeyer M; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2002 Jan; 174(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 11793295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of dose reduction using digital luminescence radiography for lateral skull radiography.
    Seifert H; Kubale R; Hagen T; Kramann B; Leetz HK
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Apr; 69(820):311-7. PubMed ID: 8665130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [ROC comparison of visualization of hand fractures using digital and conventional techniques].
    Hofstetter H; Voegeli E
    Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 9376556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
    Seifert H; Chapot C
    J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: phantom study.
    Funama Y; Awai K; Nakayama Y; Kakei K; Nagasue N; Shimamura M; Sato N; Sultana S; Morishita S; Yamashita Y
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):905-10. PubMed ID: 16237139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose reduction in thorax radiography in simulated neonates with additional filtration and digital luminescence radiography.
    Seifert H; Jesberger HJ; Schneider G; Rein L; Blass G; Limbach HG; Niewald M; Sitzmann FC; Kramann B
    Acta Radiol; 1998 Sep; 39(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 9755700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Radiation exposure in abdominal radiography with digital luminescence radiography and conventional screen-film system: an experimental animal study].
    Seifert H; Schneider G; Kubale R; Blass G; Kramann B; Leetz HK
    Rofo; 1996 Oct; 165(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 8963053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
    Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Fracture diagnosis with digital luminescence radiography].
    Klein HM; Wein B; Langen HJ; Glaser KH; Stargardt A; Günther RW
    Rofo; 1991 Jun; 154(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 1648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL HAND EXAMINATION ON SIX OPTIMISED DR SYSTEMS.
    Precht H; Outzen CB; Kusk MW; Bisgaard M; Waaler D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 May; 194(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 33969425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image intensifier position for hand and wrist fractures.
    Van Staden G; Farrant K; Richards R; Bunker T
    Injury; 2000 Jun; 31(5):351-2. PubMed ID: 10775690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography.
    Völk M; Strotzer M; Holzknecht N; Manke C; Lenhart M; Gmeinwieser J; Link J; Reiser M; Feuerbach S
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Aug; 55(8):615-21. PubMed ID: 10964733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fractal-feature distance analysis of radiographic image.
    Imai K; Ikeda M; Enchi Y; Niimi T
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 17236986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Optimization of filtration and lighting parameters in pictures of the hand using digital luminescence radiography].
    Grote R; Nast J; Rosenthal H; Calleja R; von Falkenhausen U; Rieder P
    Rofo; 1992 Jun; 156(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 1617177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-dose whole-spine imaging using slot-scan digital radiography: a phantom study.
    Ichikawa S; Muto H; Imao M; Nonaka T; Sakekawa K; Sato Y
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):17. PubMed ID: 36710344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.