These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10962993)

  • 1. [Full-field digital mammography: a phantom study for detection of microcalcification].
    Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Schorn C; Funke M; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Jul; 172(7):646-50. PubMed ID: 10962993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Full-field digital mammography: dose-dependent detectability of breast lesions and microcalcinosis].
    Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Schorn C; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1052-6. PubMed ID: 11199434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study.
    Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):478-82. PubMed ID: 12857708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
    Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications.
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Funke M; Grabbe EH
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2188-91. PubMed ID: 12195468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography.
    Fischer U; Baum F; Obenauer S; Luftner-Nagel S; von Heyden D; Vosshenrich R; Grabbe E
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Nov; 12(11):2679-83. PubMed ID: 12386757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
    Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
    Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
    Diekmann S; Bick U; von Heyden H; Diekmann F
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
    Shaw CC; Wang T; King JL; Breitenstein DS; Chang TS; Harris KM; Baratz AB; Ganott MA; Reginella R; Sumkin JH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
    Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions.
    Obenauer S; Luftner-Nagel S; von Heyden D; Munzel U; Baum F; Grabbe E
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1697-702. PubMed ID: 12111060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: comparison in the patients with microcalcifications.
    Kim HS; Han BK; Choo KS; Jeon YH; Kim JH; Choe YH
    Korean J Radiol; 2005; 6(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 16374078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.
    Dodelzon K; Simon K; Dou E; Levy AD; Michaels AY; Askin G; Katzen JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Value and significance of digital full-field mammography within the scope of mammography screening].
    Grabbe E; Fischer U; Funke M; Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Baum F
    Radiologe; 2001 Apr; 41(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 11388057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of diagnostic performances in the evaluation of breast microcalcifications: synthetic mammography versus full-field digital mammography.
    Kilic P; Sendur HN; Gultekin S; Gultekin II; Cindil E; Cerit M
    Ir J Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 191(4):1891-1897. PubMed ID: 34472041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
    Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
    J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography: image contrast and lesion characterization.
    Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Sato A; Saito M; Saito H; Matsuhashi T; Takahashi S
    Radiat Med; 2003; 21(4):166-71. PubMed ID: 14514123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.