These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10963249)

  • 1. Novel technique for three-dimensional visualisation and quantification of deformable, moving soft-tissue body parts.
    Deng J; Newton NM; Hall-Craggs MA; Shirley RA; Linney AD; Lees WR; Rodeck CH; McGrouther DA
    Lancet; 2000 Jul; 356(9224):127-31. PubMed ID: 10963249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative ultrasonographic and histomorphologic examination of the lips].
    Lefarth FL; Prescher A; Angerstein W
    HNO; 2014 Dec; 62(12):879-85. PubMed ID: 25465078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facial movement in 3 dimensions: average templates of lip movement in adults.
    Popat H; Richmond S; Marshall D; Rosin PL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Jul; 145(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21493293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of a method for analysis of morphological changes in perioral soft tissue in children using video cameras.
    Miyakawa T; Morinushi T; Yamasaki Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Mar; 33(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 16512886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinematic analysis of a Duchenne smile.
    Jaffer H; Ichesco E; Gerstner GE
    Arch Oral Biol; 2016 Apr; 64():11-8. PubMed ID: 26741999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasonographic and electromyographic evaluation of the labial musculature in children with repaired cleft lips.
    Munshi AK; Hegde AM; Srinath SK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 11314320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech movements do not scale by orofacial structure size.
    Riely RR; Smith A
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2003 Jun; 94(6):2119-26. PubMed ID: 12576407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally-compressive, three- and four-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the clitoris: a feasibility study.
    Deng J; Crouch NS; Creighton SM; Linney AD; Todd-Pokropek A; Rodeck CH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1479-84. PubMed ID: 17045867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonographic observation of the circumoral musculature: an in-vivo study.
    Prabhu NT; Munshi AK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 8611489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. sEMG-assisted inverse modelling of 3D lip movement: a feasibility study towards person-specific modelling.
    Eskes M; Balm AJM; van Alphen MJA; Smeele LE; Stavness I; van der Heijden F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17729. PubMed ID: 29255198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speed, amplitude, and asymmetry of lip movement in voluntary puckering and blowing expressions: implications for facial assessment.
    Schmidt KL; VanSwearingen JM; Levenstein RM
    Motor Control; 2005 Jul; 9(3):270-80. PubMed ID: 16239716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
    Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of age and sex on facial mimicry: a three-dimensional study in healthy adults.
    Sforza C; Mapelli A; Galante D; Moriconi S; Ibba TM; Ferraro L; Ferrario VF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(10):990-9. PubMed ID: 20598508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional appearance of the lips muscles with three-dimensional isotropic MRI: in vivo study.
    Olszewski R; Liu Y; Duprez T; Xu TM; Reychler H
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jun; 4(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 20033581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential of surface laser scanning to measure facial movement.
    Cacou C; Richards R; McGrouther DA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Apr; 99(4):982-7; discussion 988-9. PubMed ID: 9091943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Creating speech-synchronized animation.
    King SA; Parent RE
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2005; 11(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 15868833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Production of a range image for facial motion analysis: a method for analyzing lip motion.
    Mishima K; Yamada T; Ohura A; Sugahara T
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Jan; 30(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 16368223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part II: Quantification of nasolabial movement.
    Trotman CA; Faraway JJ; Losken HW; van Aalst JA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Nov; 44(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 18177193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in soft tissue profile and electromyographic activity after activator treatment.
    Erdem A; Kilic N; Eröz B
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 20043545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.