These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10964185)

  • 1. Respondent-generated quality of life measures: useful tools for nursing or more fool's gold?
    Macduff C
    J Adv Nurs; 2000 Aug; 32(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 10964185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of selected patient-generated outcome measures and their application in clinical trials.
    Patel KK; Veenstra DL; Patrick DL
    Value Health; 2003; 6(5):595-603. PubMed ID: 14627066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of empathy measurement tools in nursing: systematic review.
    Yu J; Kirk M
    J Adv Nurs; 2009 Sep; 65(9):1790-806. PubMed ID: 19694842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of life measures for patients on hemodialysis: a review of psychometric properties.
    Danquah FV; Wasserman J; Meininger J; Bergstrom N
    Nephrol Nurs J; 2010; 37(3):255-69; quiz 270. PubMed ID: 20629464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical review of generic and dermatology-specific health-related quality of life instruments.
    Both H; Essink-Bot ML; Busschbach J; Nijsten T
    J Invest Dermatol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):2726-39. PubMed ID: 17989733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The psychometric properties of the Chinese Dialysis Quality of Life Scale for Hong Kong dialysis patients.
    Suet-Ching WL
    J Adv Nurs; 2001 Nov; 36(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 11686759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
    Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of quality of life with a single instrument.
    Grant M; Padilla GV; Ferrell BR; Rhiner M
    Semin Oncol Nurs; 1990 Nov; 6(4):260-70. PubMed ID: 2274723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the "Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting" (SEIQoL-DW) in congenital heart disease.
    Moons P; Marquet K; Budts W; De Geest S
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 May; 2():27. PubMed ID: 15169564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Quality of life measures and nursing care science].
    Leplege A; Debout C
    Rech Soins Infirm; 2007 Mar; (88):18-24. PubMed ID: 17474567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome tools for diabetes-specific quality of life: Study performed in a private family practice clinic.
    Nair R; Kachan P
    Can Fam Physician; 2017 Jun; 63(6):e310-e315. PubMed ID: 28615409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'The real stuff': implications for nursing of assessing and measuring a terminally ill person's quality of life.
    Annells M; Koch T
    J Clin Nurs; 2001 Nov; 10(6):806-12. PubMed ID: 11822853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.
    Souza AC; Alexandre NMC; Guirardello EB
    Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2017; 26(3):649-659. PubMed ID: 28977189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological studies of orofacial aesthetics, orofacial function and oral health-related quality of life.
    Larsson P
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (204):11-98. PubMed ID: 20623943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of life as an outcome measure in nursing research. "May you have a long and healthy life".
    Harrison MB; Juniper EF; Mitchell-DiCenso A
    Can J Nurs Res; 1996; 28(3):49-68. PubMed ID: 8997939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ensuring content validity in instrument development: challenges and innovative approaches.
    Mastaglia B; Toye C; Kristjanson LJ
    Contemp Nurse; 2003 Jun; 14(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 12868667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of fatigue in people with cancer.
    Wu HS; McSweeney M
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2001 Oct; 28(9):1371-84; quiz 1385-6. PubMed ID: 11683308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review.
    Huang FF; Yang Q; Wang AN; Zhang JP
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Dec; 16(1):241. PubMed ID: 30591047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of a patient-centered health-related quality-of-life measure: the chronic heart failure assessment tool.
    Dunderdale K; Thompson DR; Beer SF; Furze G; Miles JN
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2008; 23(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 18596501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometric examination of instruments using aggregated data.
    Verran JA; Mark BA; Lamb G
    Res Nurs Health; 1992 Jun; 15(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 1509115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.