These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10964223)

  • 21. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective.
    Foll M; Gaggiotti O
    Genetics; 2008 Oct; 180(2):977-93. PubMed ID: 18780740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Towards second-generation STS (sequence-tagged sites) linkage maps in conifers: a genetic map of Norway spruce (Picea abies K.).
    Paglia GP; Olivieri AM; Morgante M
    Mol Gen Genet; 1998 Jun; 258(5):466-78. PubMed ID: 9669328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers.
    Zhivotovsky LA
    Mol Ecol; 1999 Jun; 8(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 10434412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Population genetics of the yellow fever mosquito in Trinidad: comparisons of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers.
    Yan G; Romero-Severson J; Walton M; Chadee DD; Severson DW
    Mol Ecol; 1999 Jun; 8(6):951-63. PubMed ID: 10434416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multicolour fluorescent detection and mapping of AFLP markers in chicken (Gallus domesticus).
    Herbergs J; Siwek M; Crooijmans RP; Van der Poel JJ; Groenen MA
    Anim Genet; 1999 Aug; 30(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 10467702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neighbour joining trees, dominant markers and population genetic structure.
    Hollingsworth PM; Ennos RA
    Heredity (Edinb); 2004 Jun; 92(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 15026781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mutation rates in scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) from the Chernobyl exclusion zone evaluated with amplified fragment-length polymorphisms (AFLPs) and microsatellite markers.
    Kuchma O; Vornam B; Finkeldey R
    Mutat Res; 2011 Oct; 725(1-2):29-35. PubMed ID: 21782970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exclusion probabilities of 22 bovine microsatellite markers in fluorescent multiplexes for semiautomated parentage testing.
    Heyen DW; Beever JE; Da Y; Evert RE; Green C; Bates SR; Ziegle JS; Lewin HA
    Anim Genet; 1997 Feb; 28(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 9124703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characterization of microsatellite loci and reliable genotyping in a polyploid plant, Mercurialis perennis (Euphorbiaceae).
    Pfeiffer T; Roschanski AM; Pannell JR; Korbecka G; Schnittler M
    J Hered; 2011; 102(4):479-88. PubMed ID: 21576288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Canine parentage testing based on microsatellite polymorphisms.
    Ichikawa Y; Takagi K; Tsumagari S; Ishihama K; Morita M; Kanemaki M; Takeishi M; Takahashi H
    J Vet Med Sci; 2001 Nov; 63(11):1209-13. PubMed ID: 11767055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Extensive spatial genetic structure revealed by AFLP but not SSR molecular markers in the wind-pollinated tree, Fagus sylvatica.
    Jump AS; Peñuelas J
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Mar; 16(5):925-36. PubMed ID: 17305851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. AFLP utility for population assignment studies: analytical investigation and empirical comparison with microsatellites.
    Campbell D; Duchesne P; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Jul; 12(7):1979-91. PubMed ID: 12803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Study on parentage testing in JIRONG rabbit by microsatellite markers].
    Han CM; Zhang JB; Gao QH; Chen QB
    Yi Chuan; 2005 Nov; 27(6):903-7. PubMed ID: 16378937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of SNP markers for individual identification and parentage test in a Japanese black cattle population.
    Hara K; Watabe H; Sasazaki S; Mukai F; Mannen H
    Anim Sci J; 2010 Apr; 81(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 20438494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the genetic variability of 23 bovine microsatellite markers in four Belgian cattle breeds.
    Peelman LJ; Mortiaux F; Van Zeveren A; Dansercoer A; Mommens G; Coopman F; Bouquet Y; Burny A; Renaville R; Portetelle D
    Anim Genet; 1998 Jun; 29(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 9720173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An intersubspecific genetic map of Lens.
    Durán Y; Fratini R; García P; Pérez de la Vega M
    Theor Appl Genet; 2004 May; 108(7):1265-73. PubMed ID: 14676948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparisons of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), microsatellite, and isoenzyme markers: population genetics of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Phnom Penh (Cambodia).
    Paupy C; Orsoni A; Mousson L; Huber K
    J Med Entomol; 2004 Jul; 41(4):664-71. PubMed ID: 15311458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microsatellites for Tetracentron sinense (Trochodendraceae), a Tertiary relict endemic to East Asia.
    Yang Z; Lu R; Tao C; Chen S; Ji Y
    Am J Bot; 2012 Aug; 99(8):e320-2. PubMed ID: 22837412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.