These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist. Pascal CB Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10964256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct. Cyranoski D Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Introduction: Forum on Responsible Conduct in Biomedical Research. Cassidy MM Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):203-4. PubMed ID: 10964252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Guidelines for training in the ethical conduct of scientific research. Garte SJ Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Jan; 1(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 11657881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct. Vences M; Zardoya R Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Anthropologists split over misconduct claims. Dalton R Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6867):5. PubMed ID: 11780079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research. Grinnell F Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 11657858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: codes, policies, and education. Macrina FL Acad Med; 2007 Sep; 82(9):865-9. PubMed ID: 17726393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The enforcement of professional ethics by scientific societies. Gardner W Prof Ethics; 1996; 5(1-2):125-38. PubMed ID: 11797739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed. Teitelbaum SL Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739-40. PubMed ID: 12490917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical challenges to risk scientists: an exploratory analysis of survey data. Greenberg M; Goldberg L Sci Technol Human Values; 1994; 19(2):223-41. PubMed ID: 11652278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct: the state's role has limits. Korn D Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739. PubMed ID: 12490916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Promoting responsible conduct: striving for change rather than consensus. Commentary on "Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research" (F. Grinnell). Zigmond MJ Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 11657860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Image doctoring must be halted. Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7660):575. PubMed ID: 28661501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientists behaving badly. Martinson BC; Anderson MS; de Vries R Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):737-8. PubMed ID: 15944677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Updates to policies and procedures related to potential scientific and academic misconduct in the journals of the American Diabetes Association. Kohler CS; Diabetes; 2012 Jan; 61(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 22187374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]