These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10964284)

  • 1. Student Research Award 1999: comparative contrast of voice measurements.
    Klein S; Piccirillo JF; Painter C
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Sep; 123(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 10964284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multivariate analysis of objective vocal function.
    Piccirillo JF; Painter C; Fuller D; Fredrickson JM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1998 Feb; 107(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 9486904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impairment of voice quality in paradoxical vocal fold motion dysfunction.
    Yelken K; Gultekin E; Guven M; Eyibilen A; Aladag I
    J Voice; 2010 Nov; 24(6):724-7. PubMed ID: 20097526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'How does that sound?': objective and subjective voice outcomes following CO₂ laser resection for early glottic cancer.
    Lester SE; Rigby MH; MacLean M; Taylor SM
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Dec; 125(12):1251-5. PubMed ID: 22018209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The correlation between subjective and objective voice evaluation in organic and functional larynx disorders].
    Wiskirska-Woźnica B; Pruszewicz A; Obrebowski A; Swidziński P
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2003; 57(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 14587393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of two objective voice function indices.
    Piccirillo JF; Painter C; Fuller D; Haiduk A; Fredrickson JM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1998 May; 107(5 Pt 1):396-400. PubMed ID: 9596217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability and validity of patient self-rating of their own voice quality.
    Lee M; Drinnan M; Carding P
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 30(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 16209679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements.
    Bhuta T; Patrick L; Garnett JD
    J Voice; 2004 Sep; 18(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15331102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multidimensional Analysis on the Effect of Vocal Function Exercises on Aged Vocal Fold Atrophy.
    Kaneko M; Hirano S; Tateya I; Kishimoto Y; Hiwatashi N; Fujiu-Kurachi M; Ito J
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):638-44. PubMed ID: 25944293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response of the female vocal quality and resonance in professional voice users taking oral contraceptive pills: a multiparameter approach.
    Van Lierde KM; Claeys S; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1894-8. PubMed ID: 17003704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between subjective self-rating and objective voice assessment measures.
    Aboras Y; El-Banna M; El-Magraby R; Ibrahim A
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2010 Apr; 35(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 20350074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subjective and perceptual analysis of voice quality and relationship with neurological disfunction in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Bauer V; Aleric Z; Jancic E; Knezevic B; Prpic D; Kacavenda A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 115 Suppl 1():S17-20. PubMed ID: 24321149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of VHI-10 to voice laboratory measurements across five common voice disorders.
    Gillespie AI; Gooding W; Rosen C; Gartner-Schmidt J
    J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 24698885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic parameters for classification of breathiness in continuous speech according to the GRBAS scale.
    Stráník A; Čmejla R; Vokřál J
    J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):653.e9-653.e17. PubMed ID: 24755168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voice characteristics of female physical education student teachers.
    Grillo EU; Fugowski J
    J Voice; 2011 May; 25(3):e149-57. PubMed ID: 20347261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of weight loss on voice after bariatric surgery.
    Hamdan AL; Safadi B; Chamseddine G; Kasty M; Turfe ZA; Ziade G
    J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):618-23. PubMed ID: 24954040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 2: subjective measurement of symptoms of voice disorder.
    Cohen W; Wardrop A; Wynne DM; Kubba H; McCartney E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Apr; 37(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 22149600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The voice handicap index: correlation between subjective patient response and quantitative assessment of voice.
    Woisard V; Bodin S; Yardeni E; Puech M
    J Voice; 2007 Sep; 21(5):623-31. PubMed ID: 16887329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements.
    Yu P; Ouaknine M; Revis J; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 11792029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceived phonatory effort and phonation threshold pressure across a prolonged voice loading task: a study of vocal fatigue.
    Chang A; Karnell MP
    J Voice; 2004 Dec; 18(4):454-66. PubMed ID: 15567047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.