These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10964820)

  • 1. Screening for amblyogenic factors using a volunteer lay network and the MTI photoscreener. Initial results from 15,000 preschool children in a statewide effort.
    Donahue SP; Johnson TM; Leonard-Martin TC
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1637-44; discussion 1645-6. PubMed ID: 10964820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age-based refinement of referral criteria for photoscreening.
    Donahue SP; Johnson TM
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Dec; 108(12):2309-14; discussion 2314-5. PubMed ID: 11733276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs: II. Sensitivity and specificity of the MTI photoscreener.
    Tong PY; Bassin RE; Enke-Miyazaki E; Macke JP; Tielsch JM; Stager DR; Beauchamp GR; Parks MM
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1623-9. PubMed ID: 10964818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of the MTI photoscreener for amblyogenic factors in infancy and early childhood.
    Weinand F; Gräf M; Demming K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Nov; 236(11):801-5. PubMed ID: 9825254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs. III. improved grading criteria for hyperopia.
    Tong PY; Macke JP; Bassin RE; Everett M; Enke-Miyazaki E; Tielsch JM; Stager DR; Parks MM; Beauchamp GR
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 10964819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors.
    Ottar WL; Scott WE; Holgado SI
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1995; 32(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 8531032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nine-year results of a volunteer lay network photoscreening program of 147 809 children using a photoscreener in Iowa.
    Longmuir SQ; Pfeifer W; Leon A; Olson RJ; Short L; Scott WE
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Oct; 117(10):1869-75. PubMed ID: 20656350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive value of photoscreening and traditional screening of preschool children.
    Salcido AA; Bradley J; Donahue SP
    J AAPOS; 2005 Apr; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 15838437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lions Clubs International Foundation Core Four Photoscreening: results from 17 programs and 400,000 preschool children.
    Donahue SP; Baker JD; Scott WE; Rychwalski P; Neely DE; Tong P; Bergsma D; Lenahan D; Rush D; Heinlein K; Walkenbach R; Johnson TM
    J AAPOS; 2006 Feb; 10(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 16527679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity of photoscreening to detect high-magnitude amblyogenic factors.
    Donahue SP; Johnson TM; Ottar W; Scott WE
    J AAPOS; 2002 Apr; 6(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 11997804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs. National Children's Eye Care Foundation Vision Screening Study Group.
    Tong PY; Enke-Miyazaki E; Bassin RE; Tielsch JM; Stager DR; Beauchamp GR; Parks MM
    Ophthalmology; 1998 May; 105(5):856-63. PubMed ID: 9593387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polaroid photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. An improved methodology.
    Freedman HL; Preston KL
    Ophthalmology; 1992 Dec; 99(12):1785-95. PubMed ID: 1480393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the iScreen and the MTI photoscreeners for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children.
    Silbert DI; Arnold RW; Matta NS
    J AAPOS; 2013 Feb; 17(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 23415034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between the plusoptiX and MTI Photoscreeners.
    Matta NS; Arnold RW; Singman EL; Silbert DI
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 127(12):1591-5. PubMed ID: 20008713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Community vision screening in preschoolers: initial experience using the Plusoptix S12C automated photoscreening camera.
    Asare AO; Malvankar-Mehta MS; Makar I
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 52(5):480-485. PubMed ID: 28985808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors by public health personnel: the Eyecor Camera System.
    Enzenauer RW; Freeman HL; Larson MR; Williams TL
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2000 Mar; 7(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 10652167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of red reflex asymmetry by pediatric residents using the Brückner reflex versus the MTI photoscreener.
    Paysse EA; Williams GC; Coats DK; Williams EA
    Pediatrics; 2001 Oct; 108(4):E74. PubMed ID: 11581482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy of photoscreening for amblyopiagenic factors in a high risk population.
    Enzenauer RW
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2003; 18(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 14653776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating photoscreeners II: MTI and fortune videorefractor.
    Cooper CD; Gole GA; Hall JE; Colville DJ; Carden SM; Bowling FG
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1999 Dec; 27(6):387-98. PubMed ID: 10641896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of photoscreening technology in the general pediatrics office: a prospective study.
    Bregman J; Donahue SP
    J AAPOS; 2016 Apr; 20(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 27079598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.