114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1096518)
1. Preparing cell suspensions from cervical smears with pepsine and ultrasonic treatment.
Freni SC; Wiepjes GJ
Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 1096518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-visual prescreening of cervical smears with a flow-through cytophotometer.
Freni SC
Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 1058617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement of the preparation method for vaginal smears for the auto-cyto-screener.
Kishigami Y; Noda S; Morishita T; Hashimoto Y
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Mar; 3(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 7015944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonic dispersal of cervical cell aggregates.
Parry JS; Cleary BK; Williams AR; Evans DM
Acta Cytol; 1971; 15(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 5282947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer recognition of ectocervical cells: image features.
Bartels PH; Abmayr W; Bibbo M; Burger G; Soost HJ; Taylor J; Wied GL
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Jun; 3(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 7020518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Pulsecytophotometric analysis of cervical cells of postmenopausal women (author's transl)].
Sachs H; Baisch H; Treu R; Linden WA; Stegner HE
Arch Gynakol; 1975; 218(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 49181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The binucleate cell: implications for automated cytopathology.
Cambier JL; Wheeless LL
Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 1056682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of single-cell classification schemes for computer classification of cervical cells.
Poulsen RS; Oliver LH; Toussaint GT; Louis C
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Sep; 3(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 7294540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trials with the cerviscan experimental prescreening device on polylysine-prepared slides.
Tucker JH; Husain OA
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Jun; 3(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 7020514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluorescent location of cells of cytological interest in cervical smears prestained with thionin.
Steven FS; Desai M; Sin J; Palcic B
Anticancer Res; 1996; 16(3A):1193-6. PubMed ID: 8702235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A critical evaluation of three methods of studying cell proliferation in human cervical epithelium.
Ireland D; Monaghan JM
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 3881711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The development of a cervical smear preparation procedure from the BioPEPR image analysis system.
Oud PS; Zahniser DJ; Harbers-Hendriks R; van Boekel MC; Raaijmakers MC; Vooijs PG
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Mar; 3(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7015946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasonic disaggregation of cell clusters.
Garcia GL; Tolles WE
J Histochem Cytochem; 1977 Jul; 25(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 894000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of ultrasonic cleaning on microorganisms.
Bettner MD; Beiswanger MA; Miller CH; Palenik CJ
Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 10388374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Image analysis study of squamous epithelial cells in cytological smears of the uterine cervix].
Bergander S; König R; Geissler U
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(16):1039-45. PubMed ID: 2220178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new method for detecting changes in the surfaces of human exfoliated cervical cells with the scanning electron microscope.
Friedlander S
Acta Cytol; 1969 May; 13(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 4895174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An improved method for the immunocytochemical detection of bromodeoxyuridine labeled nuclei using flow cytometry.
Schutte B; Reynders MM; van Assche CL; Hupperets PS; Bosman FT; Blijham GH
Cytometry; 1987 Jul; 8(4):372-6. PubMed ID: 3113895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cytology: descriptive statistics for nuclei of normal and atypical cell types.
Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Bahr GF; Taylor J; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 4517960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Flow-through cytophotometric prescreening--a comparison of methods (author's transl)].
Sprenger E; Schaden M; Wagner D; Hilgarth M; Sandritter W
Beitr Pathol; 1974 Apr; 151(4):373-83. PubMed ID: 4135140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative comparison of slide and suspension technique for acridine orange staining of human cells.
Wheeless LL; Patten SF; Onderdonk MA
Acta Cytol; 1974; 18(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 4129939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
