These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10965371)

  • 21. New methods in the assessment of diagnostic procedures.
    Kleijnen J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(7):519-25. PubMed ID: 17137065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis.
    Siadaty MS; Shu J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Dec; 4(1):27. PubMed ID: 15588327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Good interpretation of the results of a diagnostic test.
    Veziris N; Jarlier V
    Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 37(8):1143; author reply 1143-4. PubMed ID: 14523783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A procedure for determining whether a simple combination of diagnostic tests may be noninferior to the theoretical optimum combination.
    Jin H; Lu Y
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 18556633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a diagnostic test by A. Alonzo and M. Pepe, Statistics in Medicine 1999; 18: 2987-3003.
    Hadgu A; Miller W
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 11223907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Diagnostic studies].
    Felder-Puig R; Mad P; Gartlehner G
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2009; 159(13-14):359-66. PubMed ID: 19652944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Evaluation of diagnostic possibility of clinical tests].
    Rinsho Byori; 2000 Aug; Suppl 113():34-50. PubMed ID: 11103142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multivariable adjustments counteract spectrum and test review bias in accuracy studies.
    Bachmann LM; ter Riet G; Weber WE; Kessels AG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):357-361.e2. PubMed ID: 18620840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The measurement parameters and its significance of diagnostic tests].
    Zhang ZY; Zheng JW; Yang C; Zhang SY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Jun; 13(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 15269847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [What is the importance of liver fibrosis in overweight patients?].
    Zarski JP; Petit P
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Nov; 24(11):1139. PubMed ID: 11221693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
    Wang F; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationships between statistical measures of agreement: sensitivity, specificity and kappa.
    Feuerman M; Miller AR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):930-3. PubMed ID: 19018927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Meta-analysis methods for diagnostic accuracy.
    Begg CB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1081-2; discussion 1083-4. PubMed ID: 19208369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Better evaluation of diagnostic tests].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2003; 61(5):503. PubMed ID: 14671746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Critical diagnoses (critical values) in anatomic pathology.
    ; Silverman JF; Fletcher CD; Frable WJ; Goldblum JR; Pereira TC; Swanson PE
    Hum Pathol; 2006 Aug; 37(8):982-4. PubMed ID: 16867859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Assessment of a postural reference frame as a diagnostic test for lumbar lordotic posture].
    Olmedo-Buenrostro BA; Enrique-Tene C; Díaz-Giner V; Trujillo-Hernández B; Millán-Guerrero RO
    Gac Med Mex; 2006; 142(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 16548291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.