These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10965371)

  • 41. [Interpretation of efficacy measures derived from 2 X 2 tables for the evaluation of diagnostic tests and treatment].
    Bender R
    Med Klin (Munich); 2001 Feb; 96(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 11253283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of human whole genome microarrays using mixed-tissue RNA reference samples.
    Thompson KL; Pine PS
    Toxicol Lett; 2009 Apr; 186(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 18822358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparing dichotomous screening tests when individuals negative on both tests are not verified.
    Chock C; Irwig L; Berry G; Glasziou P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Nov; 50(11):1211-7. PubMed ID: 9393377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test.
    Desbiens NA
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(5):421-2. PubMed ID: 11575492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluating technologies for classification and prediction in medicine.
    Pepe MS
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3687-96. PubMed ID: 16320261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
    Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
    Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. Odds ratio is not independent of prevalence.
    Blackman NJ
    BMJ; 2001 Nov; 323(7322):1188. PubMed ID: 11711421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Analysis of the quality of studies assessing diagnostic tests].
    Zamora J; Abraira V
    Nefrologia; 2008; 28 Suppl 2():42-5. PubMed ID: 18457564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Root (caries) and other statistical treatments in dentistry].
    van 't Hof MA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Dec; 107(12):520. PubMed ID: 11383265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Extending the skill test for disease diagnosis.
    Lin SC; Kvam PH; Lu JC
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):798-813. PubMed ID: 19072748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. ROC analysis for markers with mass at zero.
    Schisterman EF; Reiser B; Faraggi D
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(4):623-38. PubMed ID: 16345033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Complementary examinations].
    Huguier M
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2005; 100(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 15810712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Presentation of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Brotman DJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 144(3):221; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 16461974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Licensing diagnostic tests may benefit everyone.
    Kilpatrick ES
    BMJ; 2005 Jun; 330(7503):1330. PubMed ID: 15933365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Test accuracy and potential sources of bias in diagnostic test evaluation.
    Bell KJ; Macaskill P; Loy C
    Med J Aust; 2020 Jan; 212(1):10-13.e1. PubMed ID: 31851371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Changes on definition and diagnostic criteria of the chronic fatigue syndrome].
    Qin Y; Pang FS; Cai BY
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 29(10):946-8. PubMed ID: 20073230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Methodology of diagnostic validation studies. Errors in planning and analysis].
    Jensen K; Abel U
    Med Klin (Munich); 1999 Sep; 94(9):522-9. PubMed ID: 10544616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club. The conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of studies of diagnostic tests, and a consideration of ROC curves: answers to the January 2010 Journal Club questions.
    Reynolds TA; Schriger DL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Jun; 55(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 20494226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in detecting ordered symptom statuses without a gold standard.
    Wang Z; Zhou XH; Wang M
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jul; 12(3):567-81. PubMed ID: 21209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Classification vs. identification in diagnostic quantitative pathology.
    Longatto Filho A; Montironi R
    Pathologica; 2000 Feb; 92(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 10843000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.