264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10966255)
1. Noninvasive whole-body electrical bioimpedance cardiac output and invasive thermodilution cardiac output in high-risk surgical patients.
Imhoff M; Lehner JH; Löhlein D
Crit Care Med; 2000 Aug; 28(8):2812-8. PubMed ID: 10966255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM; Uusitalo AJ
Crit Care Med; 1997 May; 25(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 9187596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac output can be reliably measured noninvasively after coronary artery bypass grafting operation.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM
Crit Care Med; 1999 Oct; 27(10):2206-11. PubMed ID: 10548208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.
Kaukinen S; Kööbi T; Bi Y; Turjanmaa VM
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output during coronary artery bypass grafting.
Cohen AJ; Arnaudov D; Zabeeda D; Schultheis L; Lashinger J; Schachner A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Jul; 14(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 9726617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation.
Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Bishop MH; Appel PL; Van de Water JM; Harrington GR; Wang X; Patil RS
Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1907-12. PubMed ID: 7988125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography.
Marik PE; Pendelton JE; Smith R
Crit Care Med; 1997 Sep; 25(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 9295830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution.
Suttner S; Schöllhorn T; Boldt J; Mayer J; Röhm KD; Lang K; Piper SN
Intensive Care Med; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2053-8. PubMed ID: 17039348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: whole-body impedance cardiography in simultaneous comparison with thermodilution and direct oxygen Fick methods.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Ahola T; Turjanmaa VM
Intensive Care Med; 1997 Nov; 23(11):1132-7. PubMed ID: 9434918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients.
Sageman WS; Amundson DE
Crit Care Med; 1993 Aug; 21(8):1139-42. PubMed ID: 8339577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution.
Doering L; Lum E; Dracup K; Friedman A
Crit Care Med; 1995 Oct; 23(10):1667-73. PubMed ID: 7587231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during cardiac catheterization.
Barin E; Haryadi DG; Schookin SI; Westenskow DR; Zubenko VG; Beliaev KR; Morozov AA
Crit Care Med; 2000 Mar; 28(3):698-702. PubMed ID: 10752817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique.
Maass SW; Roekaerts PM; Lancé MD
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 24746334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of cardiac output measurement by computer-averaged impedance cardiography, and comparison with simultaneous thermodilution determinations.
Pickett BR; Buell JC
Am J Cardiol; 1992 May; 69(16):1354-8. PubMed ID: 1585872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement.
Hirschl MM; Kittler H; Woisetschläger C; Siostrzonek P; Staudinger T; Kofler J; Oschatz E; Bur A; Gwechenberger M; Laggner AN
Crit Care Med; 2000 Jun; 28(6):1798-802. PubMed ID: 10890622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship of bioimpedance to thermodilution and echocardiographic measurements of cardiac function.
Spinale FG; Smith AC; Crawford FA
Crit Care Med; 1990 Apr; 18(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 2318052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radial Artery Applanation Tonometry for Continuous Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement: A Comparison With Intermittent Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution in Patients After Cardiothoracic Surgery.
Wagner JY; Sarwari H; Schön G; Kubik M; Kluge S; Reichenspurner H; Reuter DA; Saugel B
Crit Care Med; 2015 Jul; 43(7):1423-8. PubMed ID: 25844700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Esophageal electrodes allow precise assessment of cardiac output by bioimpedance.
Balestra B; Malacrida R; Leonardi L; Suter P; Marone C
Crit Care Med; 1992 Jan; 20(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 1729048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of impedance cardiography in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Panagiotou M; Vogiatzis I; Jayasekera G; Louvaris Z; Mackenzie A; Mcglinchey N; Baker JS; Church AC; Peacock AJ; Johnson MK
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Mar; 38(2):254-260. PubMed ID: 28168802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
Engoren M; Barbee D
Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
