These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10966698)

  • 1. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.
    Fletcher JG; Johnson CD; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Ahlquist DA; Reed JE; Harmsen WS; Wilson LA
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):704-11. PubMed ID: 10966698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions.
    Chen SC; Lu DS; Hecht JR; Kadell BM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):595-9. PubMed ID: 10063842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
    Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
    Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients.
    Yee J; Akerkar GA; Hung RK; Steinauer-Gebauer AM; Wall SD; McQuaid KR
    Radiology; 2001 Jun; 219(3):685-92. PubMed ID: 11376255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
    Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.
    Macari M; Bini EJ; Xue X; Milano A; Katz SS; Resnick D; Chandarana H; Krinsky G; Klingenbeck K; Marshall CH; Megibow AJ
    Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 12147833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography.
    Summers RM; Jerebko AK; Franaszek M; Malley JD; Johnson CD
    Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):391-9. PubMed ID: 12409571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography.
    Morrin MM; Farrell RJ; Kruskal JB; Reynolds K; McGee JB; Raptopoulos V
    Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):765-71. PubMed ID: 11110941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography.
    Laks S; Macari M; Bini EJ
    Radiology; 2004 Jun; 231(3):761-6. PubMed ID: 15163817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy.
    Neri E; Giusti P; Battolla L; Vagli P; Boraschi P; Lencioni R; Caramella D; Bartolozzi C
    Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):615-9. PubMed ID: 12034925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method.
    Gluecker TM; Fletcher JG; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Harmsen WS; Harrington JR; Ilstrup D; Wilson LA; Corcoran KE; Johnson CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 15039159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.
    Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography.
    Punwani S; Halligan S; Tolan D; Taylor SA; Hawkes D
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):475-81. PubMed ID: 19124562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CT colonography: clinical evaluation of a method for automatic coregistration of polyps at follow-up surveillance studies.
    Helbren E; Roth HR; Hampshire TE; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor SA; Hawkes DJ; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):417-24. PubMed ID: 24991991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deformable registration of supine and prone colons for computed tomographic colonography.
    Suh JW; Wyatt CL
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 19940658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of polyp distance on CT colonography between supine and prone scans using an automated path-distance measurement tool: correlation with colonoscopy.
    Park HS; Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SG; Han JK; Choi BI
    Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19089490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging.
    Hara AK; Johnson CD; MacCarty RL; Welch TJ; McCollough CH; Harmsen WS
    Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):461-5. PubMed ID: 11323473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactive registration between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography using band-height images.
    Song Y; Lee H; Kang HC; Shin J; Hong GS; Park SH; Lee J; Shin YG
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jan; 80():124-136. PubMed ID: 27936413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population.
    Summers RM; Johnson CD; Pusanik LM; Malley JD; Youssef AM; Reed JE
    Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11274534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Reducing Abdominal Compression during Prone CT Colonography on Ascending Colonic Rotation during Supine-to-Prone Positional Change.
    Jang JK; Park SH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
    Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 26798215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.