These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10967373)

  • 1. Moderate and severe depression. Gradations for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale.
    Müller MJ; Szegedi A; Wetzel H; Benkert O
    J Affect Disord; 2000 Nov; 60(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 10967373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiating moderate and severe depression using the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS).
    Müller MJ; Himmerich H; Kienzle B; Szegedi A
    J Affect Disord; 2003 Dec; 77(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 14612225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validity of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scales as screening and diagnostic tools for depression in Parkinson's disease.
    Leentjens AF; Verhey FR; Lousberg R; Spitsbergen H; Wilmink FW
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2000 Jul; 15(7):644-9. PubMed ID: 10918346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Derivation of a definition of remission on the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale corresponding to the definition of remission on the Hamilton rating scale for depression.
    Zimmerman M; Posternak MA; Chelminski I
    J Psychiatr Res; 2004; 38(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 15458853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Severity classification on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
    Zimmerman M; Martinez JH; Young D; Chelminski I; Dalrymple K
    J Affect Disord; 2013 Sep; 150(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 23759278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in depressed elderly: a meta-analysis.
    Heo M; Murphy CF; Meyers BS
    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2007 Oct; 15(10):899-905. PubMed ID: 17911366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of depression in Parkinson's disease: the contribution of somatic symptoms to the clinimetric performance of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg rating scales.
    Reijnders JS; Lousberg R; Leentjens AF
    J Psychosom Res; 2010 Jun; 68(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 20488273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Validity of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in an Inpatient Sample with Alcohol Dependence.
    Hobden B; Schwandt ML; Carey M; Lee MR; Farokhnia M; Bouhlal S; Oldmeadow C; Leggio L
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2017 Jun; 41(6):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 28421616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognizing depression in patients with Parkinson's disease: accuracy and specificity of two depression rating scale.
    Silberman CD; Laks J; Capitão CF; Rodrigues CS; Moreira I; Engelhardt E
    Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2006 Jun; 64(2B):407-11. PubMed ID: 16917610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of depressive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease using the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
    Bunevicius A; Staniute M; Brozaitiene J; Pommer AM; Pop VJ; Montgomery SA; Bunevicius R
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2012 Sep; 27(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 22869009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale parent report among adolescent psychiatric outpatients.
    Torres Soler C; Olofsdotter S; Vadlin S; Ramklint M; Nilsson KW; Sonnby K
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2018 Apr; 72(3):184-190. PubMed ID: 29258381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Validation of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in Colombia].
    Cano JF; Gomez Restrepo C; Rondón M
    Rev Colomb Psiquiatr; 2016; 45(3):146-55. PubMed ID: 27569008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short versions of the geriatric depression scale: a study of their validity for the diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV.
    Almeida OP; Almeida SA
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1999 Oct; 14(10):858-65. PubMed ID: 10521885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Translating the HAM-D into the MADRS and vice versa with equipercentile linking.
    Leucht S; Fennema H; Engel RR; Kaspers-Janssen M; Szegedi A
    J Affect Disord; 2018 Jan; 226():326-331. PubMed ID: 29031182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Agreement between physicians' and patients' ratings on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
    Cunningham JL; Wernroth L; von Knorring L; Berglund L; Ekselius L
    J Affect Disord; 2011 Dec; 135(1-3):148-53. PubMed ID: 21856017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implications of using different cut-offs on symptom severity scales to define remission from depression.
    Zimmerman M; Posternak MA; Chelminski I
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2004 Jul; 19(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 15201568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).
    Svanborg P; Asberg M
    J Affect Disord; 2001 May; 64(2-3):203-16. PubMed ID: 11313087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response and remission criteria in major depression--a validation of current practice.
    Riedel M; Möller HJ; Obermeier M; Schennach-Wolff R; Bauer M; Adli M; Kronmüller K; Nickel T; Brieger P; Laux G; Bender W; Heuser I; Zeiler J; Gaebel W; Seemüller F
    J Psychiatr Res; 2010 Nov; 44(15):1063-8. PubMed ID: 20447651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric Properties of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale in Severely Obese Patients.
    Paiva-Medeiros PF; Duarte-Guerra LS; Santo MA; Lotufo-Neto F; Wang YP
    Span J Psychol; 2015 Sep; 18():E69. PubMed ID: 26364907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defining remission by cut off score on the MADRS: selecting the optimal value.
    Hawley CJ; Gale TM; Sivakumaran T;
    J Affect Disord; 2002 Nov; 72(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 12200208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.