115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10967823)
1. The influence of viewing conditions on radiological diagnosis of periapical inflammation.
Patel N; Rushton VE; Macfarlane TV; Horner K
Br Dent J; 2000 Jul; 189(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 10967823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of different viewing conditions on radiological file and working length measurement.
Orafi I; Worthington HV; Qualtrough AJ; Rushton VE
Int Endod J; 2010 Jul; 43(7):600-7. PubMed ID: 20636518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of viewing conditions on observer performance in dental radiology.
Espelid I
Acta Odontol Scand; 1987 Jun; 45(3):153-61. PubMed ID: 3475949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Observer performance in the assessment of periapical pathology: a comparison of panoramic with periapical radiography.
Rohlin M; Kullendorff B; Ahlqwist M; Stenström B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 1807995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of cathode ray tube display format on observer performance in dental digitized radiography: comparison with plain films.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Nov; 23(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 7835525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of radiographic periapical diagnosis of posterior teeth.
Bohay RN
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 May; 89(5):639-42. PubMed ID: 10807725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of coronal tooth tissue in the diagnosis of apical pathosis.
Rushton VE; Qualtrough AJ; Al-Masserah Y; Rushton MN
Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):603-8. PubMed ID: 19467052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpretation of dental and maxillofacial radiographs: a comparative study using an X-ray viewing box and window.
Makdissi J
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2002; 48(4):123-4. PubMed ID: 12622015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An automated film masking and illuminating system versus conventional radiographic viewing equipment: a comparison of observer performance.
Maldjian PD; Miller JA; Maldjian JA; Baker SR
Acad Radiol; 1996 Oct; 3(10):827-33. PubMed ID: 8923901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth. Part II. The influence of viewing conditions.
Arnold LV
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Aug; 64(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 3476901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image resolution in dental and maxillofacial radiography with the conventional and "free focus" imaging concepts.
Jensen TW; Goldberg AJ; Randall GJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Jun; 51(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 6942366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of radiographic quality with five periapical techniques in general dental practice.
Rushton VE; Horner K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 8181658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of periapical and detailed narrow-beam radiography for diagnosis of periapical bone lesions.
Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Vähätalo K; Tammisalo EH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 8181644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
Molander B
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of three conditions of radiographic interpretation for assessment root canal length.
Ogata M; Loffredo Lde C; Kuga MC; Scaf G
J Appl Oral Sci; 2005 Mar; 13(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 20944887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visually detectable resolution of intraoral dental films.
Künzel A; Scherkowski D; Willers R; Becker J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):385-9. PubMed ID: 15070841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of Different Viewing Conditions on Radiographic Interpretation.
Moshfeghi M; Shahbazian M; Sajadi SS; Sajadi S; Ansari H
J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Nov; 12(11):853-8. PubMed ID: 27507997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions.
Wallace JA; Nair MK; Colaco MF; Kapa SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 11458252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print.
Otis LL; Sherman RG
J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 15819345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
