110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1096866)
1. Temporal and masking phenomena in persons with sensorineural hearing loss.
Elliott LL
Audiology; 1975; 14(4):336-53. PubMed ID: 1096866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations.
Aniansson G
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Masking level difference: a measure of auditory processing capability.
Goldstein DP; Stephens SD
Audiology; 1975; 14(4):354-67. PubMed ID: 1096867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical psychophysics. Illustrated by the problem of auditory overload.
de Boer E; Bouwmeester J
Audiology; 1975; 14(4):274-99. PubMed ID: 1147850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing.
Festen JM; Plomp R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):652-62. PubMed ID: 6841805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A test-retest reliability study on clinical measurement of masking level differences.
Stubblefield JH; Goldstein DP
Audiology; 1977; 16(5):419-31. PubMed ID: 901296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory backward-masking performance by children who stutter and its relation to dysfluency rate.
Howell P; Rosen S; Hannigan G; Rustin L
Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Apr; 90(2):355-63. PubMed ID: 10833723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory localization and its clinical applications.
Tonning FM
Audiology; 1975; 14(4):368-80. PubMed ID: 1096868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Danish hearing in noise test.
Nielsen JB; Dau T
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Studies on qualitative speech recognition, sound recognition and auditory threshold].
Müller K
Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1978; 30(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 730095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearing impairment and self-masking: listening during vocalization.
Borg E; Wikström C; Gustafsson D
Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 22686438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Review of four new indices of susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.
Humes LE
J Occup Med; 1977 Feb; 19(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 839285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
