These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10969190)

  • 21. Outcomes of agonistic interactions alter sheltering behavior in crayfish.
    Mathews L
    Behav Processes; 2021 Mar; 184():104337. PubMed ID: 33515634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differences in forebrain androgen receptor expression in winners and losers of male anole aggressive interactions.
    Hattori T; Wilczynski W
    Brain Res; 2014 Sep; 1582():45-54. PubMed ID: 25069090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The making of winners (and losers): how early dominance interactions determine adult social structure in a clonal fish.
    Laskowski KL; Wolf M; Bierbach D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 May; 283(1830):. PubMed ID: 27170711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Androgens and dominance: sex-specific patterns in a highly social fish (Neolamprologus pulcher).
    Taves MD; Desjardins JK; Mishra S; Balshine S
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2009 Apr; 161(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 19174165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 'Winner effect' without winning: unresolved social conflicts increase the probability of winning a subsequent contest in a cichlid fish.
    Dijkstra PD; Schaafsma SM; Hofmann HA; Groothuis TG
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):489-92. PubMed ID: 21939680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Once bitten, twice shy: Aggressive and defeated pigs begin agonistic encounters with more negative emotions.
    Oldham L; Arnott G; Camerlink I; Doeschl-Wilson A; Farish M; Wemelsfelder F; Turner SP
    Appl Anim Behav Sci; 2021 Nov; 244():105488. PubMed ID: 34819712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The social implications of winner and loser effects.
    Dugatkin LA; Druen M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S488-9. PubMed ID: 15801612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of Prior Contest Experience and Contest Outcome on Female Reproductive Decisions and Offspring Fitness.
    Pilakouta N; Halford C; Rácz R; Smiseth PT
    Am Nat; 2016 Sep; 188(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 27501089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Watch and learn: preview of the fighting ability of opponents alters contest behaviour in rainbow trout.
    Johnsson JI; Åkerman A
    Anim Behav; 1998 Sep; 56(3):771-776. PubMed ID: 9784229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Duration of memory of dominance relationships in a group living cichlid.
    Hotta T; Takeyama T; Jordan LA; Kohda M
    Naturwissenschaften; 2014 Sep; 101(9):745-51. PubMed ID: 25057095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects.
    Kasumovic MM; Elias DO; Sivalinghem S; Mason AC; Andrade MC
    Behav Ecol; 2010 Mar; 21(2):404-409. PubMed ID: 22476369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Strategy changes in subsequent fights as consequences of winning and losing in fruit fly fights.
    Trannoy S; Kravitz EA
    Fly (Austin); 2017 Apr; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27834611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dominance between booby nestlings involves winner and loser effects.
    Drummond H; Canales C
    Anim Behav; 1998 Jun; 55(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 9642010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of recent experience and weight on hen's agonistic behaviour during dyadic conflict resolution.
    Martin F; Beaugrand JP; Laguë PC
    Behav Processes; 1997 Nov; 41(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 24896672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Group composition affects male reproductive partitioning in a cooperatively breeding cichlid.
    Heg D; Jutzeler E; Bonfils D; Mitchell JS
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Oct; 17(19):4359-70. PubMed ID: 19378408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does losing reduce the tendency to engage with rivals to reach mates? An experimental test.
    Zang C; Chung MJ; Neeman T; Harrison L; Vinogradov IM; Jennions MD
    Behav Ecol; 2024; 35(4):arae037. PubMed ID: 38779595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does the winner-loser effect determine male mating success?
    Harrison LM; Jennions MD; Head ML
    Biol Lett; 2018 May; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 29769302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age-dependent winner-loser effects in a mangrove rivulus fish, Kryptolebias marmoratus.
    Li CY; Pan CY; Hsu Y
    Anim Cogn; 2023 Sep; 26(5):1477-1488. PubMed ID: 37294474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Individual aggressiveness in the crab Chasmagnathus: Influence in fight outcome and modulation by serotonin and octopamine.
    Pedetta S; Kaczer L; Maldonado H
    Physiol Behav; 2010 Nov; 101(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 20670638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Winning agonistic encounters increases testosterone and androgen receptor expression in Syrian hamsters.
    Clinard CT; Barnes AK; Adler SG; Cooper MA
    Horm Behav; 2016 Nov; 86():27-35. PubMed ID: 27619945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.