BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10969954)

  • 1. A newly designed key-hole button.
    Koyama J; Hongo K; Iwashita T; Kobayashi S
    J Neurosurg; 2000 Sep; 93(3):506-8. PubMed ID: 10969954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A newly designed hydroxyapatite ceramic burr-hole button.
    Kashimura H; Ogasawara K; Kubo Y; Yoshida K; Sugawara A; Ogawa A
    Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2010 Mar; 6():105-8. PubMed ID: 20448795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconstruction of burr hole by using autologous button-shaped graft harvested from inner table of craniotomy flap: technique and clinical result.
    Cokluk C; Senel A; Iyigün O; Aydin K; Rakunt C; Celik F
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2003 Dec; 46(6):372-3. PubMed ID: 14968409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cosmetic and radiological outcome following the use of synthetic hydroxyapatite porous-dense bilayer burr-hole buttons.
    Easwer HV; Rajeev A; Varma HK; Vijayan S; Bhattacharya RN
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2007; 149(5):481-5; discussion 485-6. PubMed ID: 17431537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reconstruction of pterional key hole using three-dimensional titanium plate: technical note.
    Sadatomo T; Yuki K; Migita K; Taniguchi E; Kodama Y; Kurisu K
    Hiroshima J Med Sci; 2005 Jun; 54(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 15991598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Burr hole cover for ventriculoperitoneal shunts and ventriculostomy: technical note.
    Dujovny M; Dujovny N; Viñas F; Park HK; Lopez F
    Neurol Res; 2002 Jul; 24(5):483-4. PubMed ID: 12117319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal reconstruction of the bony defect after frontotemporal craniotomy with hydroxyapatite cement.
    Sanada Y; Fujinaka T; Yoshimine T; Kato A
    J Clin Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 18(2):280-2. PubMed ID: 21030258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pterional craniotomy without keyhole to supratentorial cerebral aneurysms: technical note.
    Kang SD
    Surg Neurol; 2003 Nov; 60(5):457-61; discussion 461-2. PubMed ID: 14572972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-profile 1-piece bifrontal craniotomy for anterior skull base approach and reconstruction.
    Ozlen F; Abuzayed B; Dashti R; Isler C; Tanriover N; Sanus GZ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):233-8. PubMed ID: 20072003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anchoring of methylmethacrylate filler to the calvarium--technical note.
    Shimizu S; Kondo K; Yamazaki T; Nakayama K; Yamamoto I; Fujii K
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2011; 51(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 21358167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Experimental study on porous hydroxyapatite ceramics in repair of skull bone defect of rabbit].
    Cheng H; Wang W; Liu S
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1997 May; 11(3):129-31. PubMed ID: 9867909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of large complex cranial bone defects by using hydroxyapatite ceramic implants.
    Ono I; Tateshita T; Satou M; Sasaki T; Matsumoto M; Kodama N
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Aug; 104(2):339-49. PubMed ID: 10654676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The RIVET: a novel technique involving absorbable fixation for hydroxyapatite osteosynthesis.
    Shido H; Sakamoto Y; Miwa T; Ohira T; Yoshida K; Kishi K
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):946-8. PubMed ID: 23714917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correction of skull defects using hydroxyapatite cement (HAC)--evidence derived from animal experiments and clinical experience.
    Verheggen R; Merten HA
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2001 Sep; 143(9):919-26. PubMed ID: 11685624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preservation of the temporalis muscle during cranioplasty.
    Sharma SD; Lim B; Bentley RP
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 50(3):e36-7. PubMed ID: 21880406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cranioplasty performed with a new osteoconductive osteoinducing hydroxyapatite-derived material.
    Pompili A; Caroli F; Carpanese L; Caterino M; Raus L; Sestili G; Occhipinti E
    J Neurosurg; 1998 Aug; 89(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 9688118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Custom made bioceramic implants in complex and large cranial reconstruction: a two-year follow-up.
    Staffa G; Barbanera A; Faiola A; Fricia M; Limoni P; Mottaran R; Zanotti B; Stefini R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 40(3):e65-70. PubMed ID: 21640597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstruction of skull defects: currently available materials.
    Goiato MC; Anchieta RB; Pita MS; dos Santos DM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1512-8. PubMed ID: 19816288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scalp Tissue Expansion Above a Custom-Made Hydroxyapatite Cranial Implant to Correct Sequelar Alopecia on a Transposition Flap.
    Carloni R; Herlin C; Chaput B; De Runz A; Watier E; Bertheuil N
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Nov; 95():616.e1-616.e5. PubMed ID: 27609453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the RIVET fixation system for cranioplasty using the pull-out technique.
    Sakamoto Y; Minabe T; Kato T; Kishi K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 25555895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.