These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10970005)

  • 1. Decision analysis in evidence-based decision making.
    Tavakoli M; Davies HT; Thomson R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2000 May; 6(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 10970005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to develop cost-conscious guidelines.
    Eccles M; Mason J
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(16):1-69. PubMed ID: 11427188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Value for money in changing clinical practice: should decisions about guidelines and implementation strategies be made sequentially or simultaneously?
    Hoomans T; Severens JL; Evers SM; Ament AJ
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 19237645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision making the explicit evidence-based way: comparing benefits, harms and costs.
    McArthur J; Dickinson A
    Nurs Prax N Z; 1999 Mar; 14(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 10481662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mapping the scientific evidence for bedside care to unstable angina. A preliminary step to develop clinical guidelines. The name of the study group CAMBIE Change in the Medical services based on the clinical practice guidelines].
    Calderón Sandubet E; Cotos Cancas R; Marín León I; Briones Pérez de la Blanca E; Pérez Cano B; Grilo Reina A
    Med Clin (Barc); 2000; 114 Suppl 2():19-23. PubMed ID: 10916801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicating statin evidence to support shared decision-making.
    Barrett B; Ricco J; Wallace M; Kiefer D; Rakel D
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Apr; 17():41. PubMed ID: 27048421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One size does not fit all: questions to answer before intervening to change physician behavior.
    Poses RM
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1999 Sep; 25(9):486-95. PubMed ID: 10481818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra.
    Claxton K; Sculpher M; McCabe C; Briggs A; Akehurst R; Buxton M; Brazier J; O'Hagan T
    Health Econ; 2005 Apr; 14(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 15736142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision making in medicine and health care.
    Kaplan RM; Frosch DL
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2005; 1():525-56. PubMed ID: 17716098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shared decision-making in the care of individuals with diabetes.
    Serrano V; Rodriguez-Gutierrez R; Hargraves I; Gionfriddo MR; Tamhane S; Montori VM
    Diabet Med; 2016 Jun; 33(6):742-51. PubMed ID: 27105298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict--study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Yu CH; Ivers NM; Stacey D; Rezmovitz J; Telner D; Thorpe K; Hall S; Settino M; Kaplan DM; Coons M; Sodhi S; Sale J; Straus SE
    Trials; 2015 Jun; 16():286. PubMed ID: 26116444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol.
    van der Weijden T; Légaré F; Boivin A; Burgers JS; van Veenendaal H; Stiggelbout AM; Faber M; Elwyn G
    Implement Sci; 2010 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 20205815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. International guidelines for groin hernia management.
    HerniaSurge Group
    Hernia; 2018 Feb; 22(1):1-165. PubMed ID: 29330835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Yes", "No" or "Yes, but"? Multinomial modelling of NICE decision-making.
    Dakin HA; Devlin NJ; Odeyemi IA
    Health Policy; 2006 Aug; 77(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 16213624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.