These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10970702)

  • 41. The often overlooked issue of statistical power: this and other issues regarding assessing importance weighting in quality of life measures.
    Hsieh CM
    Soc Sci Res; 2015 Mar; 50():303-10. PubMed ID: 25592938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires.
    Perneger TV; Courvoisier DS; Hudelson PM; Gayet-Ageron A
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Jan; 24(1):147-51. PubMed ID: 25008261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. What is the importance of calculating sample size?
    Patino CM; Ferreira JC
    J Bras Pneumol; 2016 Apr; 42(2):162. PubMed ID: 27167443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size.
    Bakker M; Veldkamp CLS; van den Akker OR; van Assen MALM; Crompvoets E; Ong HH; Wicherts JM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236079. PubMed ID: 32735597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Planning for subgroup analysis: a case study of treatment-marker interaction in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Gönen M
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Aug; 24(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12865031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Validus Medicus and a new gold standard.
    Ziliak ST
    Lancet; 2010 Jul; 376(9738):324-5. PubMed ID: 20681063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Power(ful) myths: misconceptions regarding sample size in quality of life research.
    Anderson SF
    Qual Life Res; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2917-2929. PubMed ID: 34716528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Statistics notebook: entry I.L., theoretical aspects of three important cousins of the normal distribution, (1) The chi 2 distribution, (2) The t distribution, and (3) The F distribution.
    De Land PN; Chase WW
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Nov; 67(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 2250896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. What Information Will a Statistician Need to Help Me With a Sample Size Calculation?
    Ellerbe C
    Stroke; 2015 Jul; 46(7):e159-61. PubMed ID: 26069257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How to calculate sample size and why.
    Kim J; Seo BS
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2013 Sep; 5(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 24009911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?
    Jackson D; White IR
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1040-1058. PubMed ID: 30062789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Study on the power of O/E method].
    Wu Y; Chen F; Kang C; Yang S
    Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 1998 Mar; 29(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 10683984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Standard deviations and standard errors.
    Altman DG; Bland JM
    BMJ; 2005 Oct; 331(7521):903. PubMed ID: 16223828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Re: 'Planning sample sizes: comparison of factor level means'.
    Ward JA; Johnson JM
    Nurs Res; 1991; 40(4):235, 240. PubMed ID: 1857650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cost efficiency in study planning and completion. How many cases? How many controls?
    Rosenberg MJ
    Am J Med; 1983 Nov; 75(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 6416065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Inadequacy of sample sizes in clinical trials of laboratory parameters attributable to invalid statistical assumptions.
    Halpern EF
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1994 Oct; 56(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 7955805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The problem of performing adequately sized randomized trials to demonstrate small survival benefits.
    Paesmans M; Sculier JP
    Eur Respir J; 2000 May; 15(5):819-20. PubMed ID: 10853842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sample size matters: a guide for surgeons.
    Guller U; Oertli D
    World J Surg; 2005 May; 29(5):601-5. PubMed ID: 15834629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Problems with using the normal distribution--and ways to improve quality and efficiency of data analysis.
    Limpert E; Stahel WA
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e21403. PubMed ID: 21779325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Robustness of the two independent samples t-test when applied to ordinal scaled data.
    Heeren T; D'Agostino R
    Stat Med; 1987; 6(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 3576020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.