These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10971690)

  • 1. Quantitative genetics of allogamous F2: an origin of randomly fertilized populations.
    Gordon IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 2000 Jul; 85 ( Pt 1)():43-52. PubMed ID: 10971690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative genetics of autogamous F2.
    Gordon IL
    Hereditas; 2001; 134(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 11833289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative genetics of intraspecies hybrids.
    Gordon IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1999 Dec; 83 ( Pt 6)():757-64. PubMed ID: 10651921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Refinements to the partitioning of the inbred genotypic variance.
    Gordon IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 2003 Jul; 91(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 12815457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pedigree-based estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines considering inbreeding and using a computationally simpler equivalent model.
    Fernández EN; Legarra A; Martínez R; Sánchez JP; Baselga M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):184-195. PubMed ID: 28508486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimates of inbreeding in a natural population: a comparison of sampling properties.
    Curie-Cohen M
    Genetics; 1982 Feb; 100(2):339-58. PubMed ID: 7106561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of genetic variance in an F2 maize population.
    Wolf DP; Peternelli LA; Hallauer AR
    J Hered; 2000; 91(5):384-91. PubMed ID: 10994705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.
    Vitezica ZG; Legarra A; Toro MA; Varona L
    Genetics; 2017 Jul; 206(3):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 28522540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EVOLUTIONARY PREDICTABILITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: DO MATING SYSTEM AND NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE INTERACT TO AFFECT HERITABILITIES IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA?
    Tonsor SJ; Goodnight CJ
    Evolution; 1997 Dec; 51(6):1773-1784. PubMed ID: 28565103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of inbreeding depression, non-inbred dominance deviations and random year-season effect in genetic trends for prolificacy in closed rabbit lines.
    Fernández EN; Sánchez JP; Martínez R; Legarra A; Baselga M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Dec; 134(6):441-452. PubMed ID: 28685498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partial Dominance, Overdominance and Epistasis as the Genetic Basis of Heterosis in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).
    Liang Q; Shang L; Wang Y; Hua J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143548. PubMed ID: 26618635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
    Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social selection in human populations: protected polymorphism of deleterious alleles with incomplete penetrance.
    Yokoyama S
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 3609722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of Seven Tree Breeding Strategies Under Conditions of Inbreeding Depression.
    Wu HX; Hallingbäck HR; Sánchez L
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Jan; 6(3):529-40. PubMed ID: 26739644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The correlation of substitution effects across populations and generations in the presence of nonadditive functional gene action.
    Legarra A; Garcia-Baccino CA; Wientjes YCJ; Vitezica ZG
    Genetics; 2021 Dec; 219(4):. PubMed ID: 34718531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic analysis of oil content in Brassica napus L. using mixed model of major gene and polygene.
    Zhang SF; Ma CZ; Zhu JC; Wang JP; Wen YC; Fu TD
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Feb; 33(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 16529301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of genetic drift on the variance/covariance components generated by multilocus additive x additive epistatic systems.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16242726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors of marker-informativeness for an outbred F2 design.
    Rocha JL; Pomp D; Vleck LD; Nielsen MK
    Anim Genet; 2001 Dec; 32(6):365-70. PubMed ID: 11736807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.