304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10973199)
21. Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops.
Kok EJ; Kuiper HA
Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):439-44. PubMed ID: 14512230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Food biotechnology in the new millennium: promises, realities, and challenges.
McCullum C
J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Nov; 100(11):1311-5. PubMed ID: 11103652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Unintended effects in genetically modified crops: revealed by metabolomics?
Rischer H; Oksman-Caldentey KM
Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):102-4. PubMed ID: 16460820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Regulation and exploitation of genetically modified crops.
Kleter GA; van der Krieken WM; Kok EJ; Bosch D; Jordi W; Gilissen LJ
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Dec; 19(12):1105-10. PubMed ID: 11731773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. US food-safety body hears protests over genetically modified food.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6762):571. PubMed ID: 10604452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. No Munich on GM crops.
Malvoisin P; Grausz JD
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1501; discussion 1501. PubMed ID: 15583648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. US reforms rules for telling public about GM food.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2000 May; 405(6783):108. PubMed ID: 10821240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Scientists back GM for Third World.
Dickson D
Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6792):115. PubMed ID: 10910326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Current issues connected with usage of genetically modified crops in production of feed and livestock feeding.
Kwiatek K; Mazur M; Sieradzki Z
Pol J Vet Sci; 2008; 11(4):411-4. PubMed ID: 19227143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. GM labeling in China beset by problems.
Jia H
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):835-6. PubMed ID: 12894183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Genetically modified crops and factual information.
Griffiths M
Biologist (London); 2000 Jun; 47(3):113. PubMed ID: 11190239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Action needed to harmonize regulation of low-level presence of biotech traits.
Krueger R; Le Buanec B
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 18259165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The food label and the right-to-know.
Degnan FH
Food Drug Law J; 1997; 52(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 10346709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. EU plans to label and trace GMOs.
Dorey E
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):795. PubMed ID: 11533623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. This should not be the end for terminator technology in GM crops.
Jackson A; Inglehearn C
Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6761):457. PubMed ID: 10591198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops.
Dale PJ; Clarke B; Fontes EM
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 12042859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identity, traceability, acceptability and substantial equivalence of food.
Pascal G; Mahé S
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2001 Dec; 47(8):1329-42. PubMed ID: 11838953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
Lusk JL; Rozan A
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Crop conundrum.
Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):307-8. PubMed ID: 26672517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
