78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10973292)
1. ORI to study why cheaters cheat.
Ready T
Nat Med; 2000 Sep; 6(9):946. PubMed ID: 10973292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of culture in research misconduct.
Davis MS
Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sitting in judgement.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
Bentley P
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
Price AR
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
Mosimann JE
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
Reynolds GH
Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties.
Soskolne CL
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
Scheetz MD
Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Swift justice salvages reputations.
Kaiser J
Science; 1996 Oct; 274(5286):338. PubMed ID: 8927988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Plagiarize or perish?
Ready T
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
Wright DE
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. ORI defended.
Price AR
Nature; 1996 Jan; 379(6560):11. PubMed ID: 8538729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Can't hide your lying eyes.
Wadman M
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. So you suspect someone of fraud. What now?
Powell K
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492. PubMed ID: 16675983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity.
Adams D; Pimple KD
Account Res; 2005; 12(3):225-40. PubMed ID: 16634173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Collateral damage.
Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7310):1023. PubMed ID: 20739963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: evidence from ORI case files.
Davis MS; Riske-Morris M; Diaz SR
Sci Eng Ethics; 2007 Dec; 13(4):395-414. PubMed ID: 18038194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
