78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10973292)
21. Fellow scientists begin to get suspicious about data.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Your own desktop crime lab.
Powell K
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):493. PubMed ID: 16675984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Arizona professor files lawsuit after being fired for misconduct.
Dalton R
Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):817. PubMed ID: 9732854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Education and penalties are key to tackling misconduct.
Wang K
Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7051):626. PubMed ID: 16079819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Misconduct: pressure to achieve corrodes ideals.
Breitling LP
Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7051):626. PubMed ID: 16079817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
Price AR
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Human cloning and scientific corruption: the South Korea scandal and the future of the stem cell debate.
New Atlantis; 2006; 11():113-7. PubMed ID: 16789313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Repairing research integrity.
Titus SL; Wells JA; Rhoades LJ
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):980-2. PubMed ID: 18563131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Breeding cheats.
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):242-3. PubMed ID: 17230160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Research integrity: Sabotage!
Maher B
Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):516-8. PubMed ID: 20881988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Research ethics. Global research integrity training.
Steneck NH
Science; 2013 May; 340(6132):552-3. PubMed ID: 23641099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. 'Rehab' helps errant researchers return to the lab.
Cressey D
Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7431):147. PubMed ID: 23302839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The road to fraud starts with a single step.
Crocker J
Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7372):151. PubMed ID: 22071724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Rooting out scientific misconduct.
Oransky I; Redman B
Science; 2024 Jan; 383(6679):131. PubMed ID: 38207024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire--Revised (SMQ-R): validation and psychometric testing.
Broome ME; Pryor E; Habermann B; Pulley L; Kincaid H
Account Res; 2005; 12(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 16578917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. On identifying research misconduct respondents.
Parrish DM
Sci Eng Ethics; 2005 Apr; 11(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 15915856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Publish or perish in China.
Qiu J
Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Nine pitfalls of research misconduct.
Gunsalus CK; Robinson AD
Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):297-299. PubMed ID: 29769690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992-2002.
Reynolds SM
Clin Trials; 2004; 1(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 16279291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Popovic wins appeal against ORI charges.
Culliton BJ
Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):99. PubMed ID: 8232566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
