These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10974293)

  • 1. Comparison between Dawson, Trick, and Litzkow electrode and contact lens electrodes used in clinical electroretinography.
    Kuze M; Uji Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2000; 44(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 10974293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing.
    Yin H; Pardue MT
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 108(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15104170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of DTL electrode position on the amplitude and implicit time of the electroretinogram.
    Brouwer AH; de Wit GC; de Boer JH; van Genderen MM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 140(3):201-209. PubMed ID: 31686287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability of the multifocal electroretinogram based on the type and position of the electrode.
    García-García Á; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 133(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 27665467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of different recording parameters to establish a standard for flash electroretinography in rodents.
    Bayer AU; Cook P; Brodie SE; Maag KP; Mittag T
    Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(17):2173-85. PubMed ID: 11448710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing DTL microfiber and Neuroline skin electrode in the Mini Ganzfeld ERG.
    Lapkovska A; Palmowski-Wolfe AM; Todorova MG
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():137. PubMed ID: 27491453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes.
    Beeler P; Barthelmes D; Sutter FK; Helbig H; Fleischhauer JC
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 17458789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of recording electrode type and reference electrode position on the canine electroretinogram.
    Mentzer AE; Eifler DM; Montiani-Ferreira F; Tuntivanich N; Forcier JQ; Petersen-Jones SM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 111(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 16514491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a new fiber electrode prototype for clinical electroretinography.
    Berezovsky A; Pereira JM; Salomão SR; Santos VR; Schor P
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 18641814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amplitude scaling relationships of Burian-Allen, gold foil and Dawson, Trick and Litzkow electrodes.
    Hennessy MP; Vaegan
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 89(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 7555591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ERG electrode in pediatric patients: comparison of DTL fiber, PVA-gel, and non-corneal skin electrodes.
    Coupland SG; Janaky M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1989 Apr; 71(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 2791850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison between subtraction skin electrodes and corneal-contact electrodes in flash electroretinograms].
    Kaid T; Matsunag M; Hanaya J; Nakamura Y; Ohtani S; Miyat K; Kondo M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Jan; 117(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 23424970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of DTL and gold cup skin electrodes for recordings of the multifocal electroretinogram.
    Eckermann T; Hoffmann MB; Al-Nosairy KO
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 146(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 36536110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response.
    Tang J; Hui F; Hadoux X; Sarossy M; van Wijngaarden P; Coote M; Crowston JG
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 7(6):27. PubMed ID: 30619647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes.
    Mortlock KE; Binns AM; Aldebasi YH; North RV
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 121(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 20607349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of electroretinograms recorded with DTL electrodes.
    Hébert M; Lachapelle P; Dumont M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995-1996; 91(4):333-42. PubMed ID: 8899303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recording the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram with the DTL electrode.
    Lachapelle P; Benoit J; Little JM; Lachapelle B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1993; 83(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 8334927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Electroretinography study of unanesthetized young children].
    Eckstein A; Eckstein S; Rüther K; Zrenner E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 Feb; 204(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 8170092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The DTL ERG electrode comes in different shapes and sizes: Are they all good?
    Woo J; Jung S; Gauvin M; Lachapelle P
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 135(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 28741115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and efficacy evaluation of a new ERG electrode (the LVP electrode) part II. Flash ERG pilot study.
    Mohan Ram LS; Jalali S; Faheemuddin S; Das T; Nutheti R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2003 Sep; 107(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 14661908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.